Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21805087›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2011

Biomarkers for the differentiation of sepsis and SIRS: the need for the standardisation of diagnostic studies.

T C Hall, D K Bilku, D Al-Leswas, C Horst, A R Dennison

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Laboratory Diagnosis of Sepsis? No SIRS, Not Just Yet.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Acyl-lipid metabolism.The arabidopsis book · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T C HallDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. tch2@doctors.org.uk
D K Bilku
D Al-Leswas
C Horst
A R Dennison
Leicester General Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis is a leading cause of death in the critically ill patient. It is a heterogeneous disease and it is frequently difficult to make an unequivocal and expeditious diagnosis. The current 'gold standard' in diagnosing sepsis is the blood culture but this is only available after a significant time delay. Mortality rates from sepsis remain high, however, the introduction of sepsis care bundles in its management has produced significant improvements in patient outcomes. Central to goal-directed resuscitation is the timely and accurate diagnosis of sepsis. The rapid diagnosis and commencement of the appropriate therapies has been shown to reduce the mortality. MATERIALS AND

methodsBiomarkers are already used in clinical practice to aid other more traditional diagnostic tests. In the absence of an adequate gold standard to diagnose sepsis, there has been considerable and growing interest in trying to identify suitable biomarkers. There is currently an unmet need in the medical literature to communicate the importance of the challenges relating to the rapid diagnosis and implementation of goal-directed therapy in sepsis and the underlying concepts that are directing these investigations. This article reviews the more novel biomarkers investigated to differentiate systemic inflammatory response syndrome from sepsis.

conclusionThe biomarkers described reflect the difficulties in making evidence-based recommendations particularly when interpreting studies where the methodology is of poor quality and the results are conflicting. We are reminded of our responsibilities to ensure high quality and standardised study design as articulated by the STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) initiative.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiomedical ResearchDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansSepsisSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID21805087
OpenAlexW2086798399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.