Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21804463›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2011

Teriparatide vs. alendronate as a treatment for osteoporosis: changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, BMD and quality of life.

Annalisa Panico, Gelsy Arianna Lupoli, Francesca Marciello, Roberta Lupoli, Marianna Cacciapuoti, Addolorata Martinelli, Luciana Granieri, Daniela Iacono, Giovanni Lupoli

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Multivitamin mineral supplementation in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The factors related to the poor ADL in the patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture after instrumentation surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association of gastrointestinal events with quality of life and treatment satisfaction in osteoporosis patients: results from the Medication Use Patterns, Treatment Satisfaction, and Inadequate Control of Osteoporosis Study (MUSIC OS).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Annalisa PanicoDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Gelsy Arianna Lupoli
Francesca Marciello
Roberta Lupoli
Marianna Cacciapuoti
Addolorata Martinelli
Luciana Granieri
Daniela Iacono
Giovanni Lupoli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe studied the use of teriparatide in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis. MATERIAL/

methodsTwo groups (A and B) of patients affected by severe osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5 at bone mineral density were analyzed and 2 vertebral fractures on radiograph). Group A was treated for 18 months with 20 µg/day of teriparatide. Group B was treated with bisphosphonates 70 mg/week. Every woman assumed 1 g of calcium and 800 IU of vitamin D3 daily. We evaluated the effects of therapy after 18 months (T18) from the beginning with bone turnover markers (alkaline phosphatase, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, and N-telopeptide cross-links) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

resultsGroup A, at T18 procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide levels, increased 127%; bone alkaline phosphatase levels increased to 65%; N-telopeptide cross-links levels increased to 110%. Group B, at T18 procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide levels, decreased to 74%; bone alkaline phosphatase levels decreased to 41%; N-telopeptide cross-links levels decreased to 72%. After 18 months, lumbar bone mineral density increased to 12.4% and femoral bone mineral density increased to 5.2% in group A. Group B lumbar bone mineral density increased to 3.85% and femoral bone mineral density increased to 1.99%. Only a new vertebral fracture occurred in group A (2.4%), whereas 6 fractures occurred in group B (15.7%). The quality of life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) revealed a significant improvement in daily living, performed domestic jobs, and locomotor function in groups A and B.

conclusionsThe use of rhPTH in patients with severe osteoporosis offers more protection against fractures and improves the QoL more than bisphosphonates.

Indexed as

AgedAlendronateBiomarkersBone and BonesBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSpineTeriparatideAlendronateBiomarkersBone Density Conservation AgentsTeriparatide

Identifiers

PMID21804463
PMCPMC3539612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.