Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21803769›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2011

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship programme changes on unnecessary double anaerobic coverage therapy.

Pinyo Rattanaumpawan, Knashawn H Morales, Shawn Binkley, Marie Synnestvedt, Mark G Weiner, Leanne B Gasink, Neil O Fishman, Ebbing Lautenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Redundant combinations of antianaerobic antimicrobials: impact of pharmacist-based prospective audit and feedback and prescription characteristics.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pinyo RattanaumpawanCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. pinyo@mail.med.upenn.ed
Knashawn H Morales
Shawn Binkley
Marie Synnestvedt
Mark G Weiner
Leanne B Gasink
Neil O Fishman
Ebbing Lautenbach

Funding

Mentoring and patient-oriented research in antimicrobial resistanceK24AI080942 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAUTENBACH, EBBING · 2009 to 2013
$853k
NIAID NIH HHS K24-AI080942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcern has been raised over the practice of unnecessary double anaerobic coverage therapy (DACT) in the hospital setting. However, the incidence of and risk factors for unnecessary DACT are not well studied. On 8 September 2008, the antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) at our institution was modified such that several antibiotics, including ampicillin/sulbactam and metronidazole, no longer required pre-approval. We anticipated that this change would increase both unnecessary DACT and target antibiotic consumption.

methodsA nested case-control study was conducted to determine the cumulative incidence of and risk factors for unnecessary DACT. Cases were subjects who received unnecessary DACT while controls were subjects who did not receive DACT or who received necessary DACT. Segmented regression analysis was subsequently performed to evaluate the impact of ASP changes on unnecessary DACT and consumption of target antibiotics.

resultsFrom October 2007 to September 2009, the cumulative incidence of unnecessary DACT was 2.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-3.1]. Independent risk factors for unnecessary DACT [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI); P value] included hospitalization on a surgical ward [3.51 (1.03-12.02); P = 0.002], hospitalization on an obstetrics and gynaecology ward [9.07 (2.54-32.40); P = 0.002] and underlying metastatic malignancy [3.18 (1.38-7.09); P = 0.006]. The ASP change was associated with an increase in ampicillin/sulbactam and metronidazole consumption. However, there was no significant impact on unnecessary DACT prescribing.

conclusionsAlthough uncommon, unnecessary DACT is more prevalent in specific services. Future qualitative studies focusing on these specific subgroups would be useful in elucidating this problem more clearly. The ASP changes were not associated with increases in unnecessary DACT.

Indexed as

Bacteria, AnaerobicAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsCase-Control StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringDrug UtilizationHospitalsHumansInappropriate PrescribingMetronidazolePractice Patterns, Physicians'SulbactamAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMetronidazoleSulbactam

Identifiers

PMID21803769
PMCPMC3191943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.