Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21803767›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2011

Selection for translation efficiency on synonymous polymorphisms in recent human evolution.

Yedael Y Waldman, Tamir Tuller, Alon Keinan, Eytan Ruppin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Influence ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Explosive genetic evidence for explosive human population growth.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Association analysis ofOncoTargets and therapy · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neutral genomic regions refine models of recent rapid human population growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yedael Y WaldmanBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tamir Tuller
Alon Keinan
Eytan Ruppin
Tel Aviv University · ILCornell University · USWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

Population Structure Admixture and Selection across the 1000 Genomes Data SetU01HG005715 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG005715NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG005715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synonymous mutations are considered to be "silent" as they do not affect protein sequence. However, different silent codons have different translation efficiency (TE), which raises the question to what extent such mutations are really neutral. We perform the first genome-wide study of natural selection operating on TE in recent human evolution, surveying 13,798 synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 1,198 unrelated individuals from 11 populations. We find evidence for both negative and positive selection on TE, as measured based on differentiation in allele frequencies between populations. Notably, the likelihood of an SNP to be targeted by positive or negative selection is correlated with the magnitude of its effect on the TE of the corresponding protein. Furthermore, negative selection acting against changes in TE is more marked in highly expressed genes, highly interacting proteins, complex members, and regulatory genes. It is also more common in functional regions and in the initial segments of highly expressed genes. Positive selection targeting sites with a large effect on TE is stronger in lowly interacting proteins and in regulatory genes. Similarly, essential genes are enriched for negative TE selection while underrepresented for positive TE selection. Taken together, these results point to the significant role of TE as a selective force operating in humans and hence underscore the importance of considering silent SNPs in interpreting associations with complex human diseases. Testifying to this potential, we describe two synonymous SNPs that may have clinical implications in phenylketonuria and in Best's macular dystrophy due to TE differences between alleles.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetics, MedicalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein BiosynthesisSelection, GeneticCodonGenome, HumanHumansModels, GeneticProteinsRacial GroupsCodonProteins

Identifiers

PMID21803767
PMCPMC3163469
OpenAlexW2121707102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.