ReviewAnnals of botany2011
Compatibility and incompatibility in S-RNase-based systems.
Review in Annals of botany, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproductive isolation emerges from coordinated barriers during mating system divergence in plants.AoB PLANTS · 2026Article
- SDJ, a pollen-expressed type III J-protein in Prunus, directly binds S-RNase and promotes recruitment of SLFL6 to an S-RNase-associated complex.Plant reproduction · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Transcriptomic Dynamics of Self-Incompatibility in Yellow Passion Fruit: Evidence of Modified Sporophytic Mechanism.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- OsRNS4-mediated cross-kingdom RNA interference is inhibited byScience advances · 2026Article
- Genomic architecture and evolution of heterostyly: new insights from Cordia subcordata (Boraginaceae).Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Self-sterility, self-incompatibility and xenia: a review of the mechanisms of cross-pollination benefits in animal-pollinated crops.Annals of botany · 2025Review
- Molecular mechanisms and genetic regulation of self-incompatibility in flowering plants: implications for crop improvement and evolutionary biology.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- The cytological basis of self-incompatibility in goji (Lycium barbarum) and the cloning of S-RNase gene.Planta · 2025Article
- The Quest for thePotato research · 2025Article
- Rapid detection of RNase-based self-incompatibility in Lysimachia monelli (Primulaceae).American journal of botany · 2025Article
- New Frontiers in Potato Breeding: Tinkering with Reproductive Genes and Apomixis.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- A survey of thePlant direct · 2024Article
- The origin and the genetic regulation of the self-compatibility mechanism in clementine (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- The influence of the pollination compatibility type on the pistilFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Genome-wide identification and characterization of SRLK gene family reveal their roles in self-incompatibility of Erigeron breviscapus.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Hormonal Signaling during dPCD: Cytokinin as the Determinant of RNase-Based Self-Incompatibility in Solanaceae.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- The Effect of Self-Compatibility Factors on Interspecific Compatibility inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Expression and function of an S1-type nuclease in the digestive fluid of a sundew, Drosera adelae.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of prezygotic post-pollination reproductive barriers in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundS-RNase-based self-incompatibility (SI) occurs in the Solanaceae, Rosaceae and Plantaginaceae. In all three families, compatibility is controlled by a polymorphic S-locus encoding at least two genes. S-RNases determine the specificity of pollen rejection in the pistil, and S-locus F-box proteins fulfill this function in pollen. S-RNases are thought to function as S-specific cytotoxins as well as recognition proteins. Thus, incompatibility results from the cytotoxic activity of S-RNase, while compatible pollen tubes evade S-RNase cytotoxicity. SCOPE: The S-specificity determinants are known, but many questions remain. In this review, the genetics of SI are introduced and the characteristics of S-RNases and pollen F-box proteins are briefly described. A variety of modifier genes also required for SI are also reviewed. Mutations affecting compatibility in pollen are especially important for defining models of compatibility and incompatibility. In Solanaceae, pollen-side mutations causing breakdown in SI have been attributed to the heteroallelic pollen effect, but a mutation in Solanum chacoense may be an exception. This has been interpreted to mean that pollen incompatibility is the default condition unless the S-locus F-box protein confers resistance to S-RNase. In Prunus, however, S-locus F-box protein gene mutations clearly cause compatibility.
conclusionsTwo alternative mechanisms have been proposed to explain compatibility and incompatibility: compatibility is explained either as a result of either degradation of non-self S-RNase or by its compartmentalization so that it does not have access to the pollen tube cytoplasm. These models are not necessarily mutually exclusive, but each makes different predictions about whether pollen compatibility or incompatibility is the default. As more factors required for SI are identified and characterized, it will be possible to determine the role each process plays in S-RNase-based SI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.