Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21802851›Full record

Trial reportPain2011

Sensory responses to injection and punctate application of capsaicin and histamine to the skin.

Parul Sikand, Steven G Shimada, Barry G Green, Robert H LaMotte

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03096444 (Antipruritic Effect of Topical Ketamine, Amitriptyline, and Lidocaine), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03096444 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Antipruritic Effect of Topical Ketamine, Amitriptyline, and Lidocaine

TypeinterventionalSponsorGil YosipovitchRan2017 to 2017Enrolled13ConditionsPruritusArmsKetamine Hydrochloride, Amitriptyline Hydrochloride, Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Ketamine hydrochloride, Amitriptyline hydrochloride, and Lidocaine hydrochloride, Lipoderm Cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. TRPV1 in Pain and Itch.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuropathic Itch.Cells · 2020
    Review
  12. Physiology and Pathophysiology of Itch.Physiological reviews · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Inhibition of M/KFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parul SikandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA Sensory Neuroscience, The John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT, USA.
Steven G Shimada
Barry G Green
Robert H LaMotte
Yale University · US

Funding

Research Project CoreP01NS047399 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LA MOTTE, ROBERT H · 2004 to 2013
$11.0M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS 047399NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS047399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A punctate, cutaneous application of capsaicin or histamine by means of a cowhage spicule elicits itch accompanied by pricking/stinging, burning, and typically, one or more areas of dysesthesia (alloknesis, hyperalgesia, hyperknesis). When applied over a wider and deeper area of skin by means of intradermal injection, histamine evokes the same sensory effects, but capsaicin evokes pain and hyperalgesia with allodynia instead of alloknesis. To examine the sensory effects of the spatial spread, depth, and amount of capsaicin and histamine, we applied different amounts of capsaicin or histamine by intradermal injection or by single vs multiple spicules within a circular cutaneous region of ~5 mm. Subjects rated the perceived intensity of itch, pricking/stinging, and burning for 20 minutes. Histamine injections or multiple spicules of capsaicin or histamine that resulted in a greater area of flare than a single spicule of each chemical evoked no greater magnitudes of sensation or areas of dysesthesia. Capsaicin injections elicited a dose-dependent increase in the magnitude of nociceptive sensations, areas of dysesthesia, and flare. However, there was little or no itch; and allodynia replaced alloknesis. Yet, hyperalgesia was typically accompanied by hyperknesis. We conclude that the pruritic sensory responses produced by capsaicin/histamine spicules and histamine injections may be due to activation of common nerve fibers, possibly different from those mediating the flare, and that capsaicin injections may activate additional fibers whose effects mask the sensory effects of fibers mediating itch and alloknesis but not hyperknesis.

Indexed as

Acute PainCapsaicinFemaleHistamineHistamine AgonistsHumansHyperalgesiaInjections, IntradermalMaleNociceptorsSensory System AgentsSkinCapsaicinHistamineHistamine AgonistsSensory System Agents

Identifiers

PMID21802851
PMCPMC3199342
OpenAlexW2007542365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.