Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21802790›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2012

[Research and protection of personal data in Primary Care].

Sofía Garrido Elustondo, Luisa Cabello Ballesteros, Inés Galende Domínguez, Rosario Riesgo Fuertes, Ricardo Rodríguez Barrientos, Elena Polentinos Castro

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sofía Garrido ElustondoTécnico de Salud, Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Sureste de la Gerencia de Atención Primaria de Madrid, Madrid, España. sgarrido.gapm07@salud.madrid.org
Luisa Cabello Ballesteros
Inés Galende Domínguez
Rosario Riesgo Fuertes
Ricardo Rodríguez Barrientos
Elena Polentinos Castro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research is one of the fundamental functions that have to be carried out in Primary Care. The clinical information stored in different records arising from medical care is a basic tool for this activity. The use of personal data for the purposes of research is legitimate according to our laws; however, this information must be treated confidentially at all times. Two alternatives are available for this. One is to obtain the informed consent of the patient, and the other is to dissociate the handling of the information. But in some situations, the compliance to legal demands when obtaining data for research is not easy, there being a series of obstacles which in many cases makes it impossible to carry out research. In this article, we will give guidance on how to access the information contained in records while respecting the rights of the patient and the current legislation.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareBiomedical ResearchConfidentialityGuidelines as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID21802790
PMCPMC7025257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.