Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21802404›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2012

Cytochrome c oxidase: evolution of control via nuclear subunit addition.

Denis Pierron, Derek E Wildman, Maik Hüttemann, Gopi Chand Markondapatnaikuni, Siddhesh Aras, Lawrence I Grossman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genomic Signatures of Mitonuclear Coevolution in Mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Functions of CytochromeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denis PierronWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Derek E Wildman
Maik Hüttemann
Gopi Chand Markondapatnaikuni
Siddhesh Aras
Lawrence I Grossman
Wayne State University · US

Funding

Mitochondrial-nuclear gene co-evolution and adaptationR24GM065580 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI STEWART, CARO-BETH R. · 2002 to 2005
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM65580NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM065580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to theory, present eukaryotic cells originated from a beneficial association between two free-living cells. Due to this endosymbiotic event the pre-eukaryotic cell gained access to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), which produces more than 15 times as much ATP as glycolysis. Because cellular ATP needs fluctuate and OXPHOS both requires and produces entities that can be toxic for eukaryotic cells such as ROS or NADH, we propose that the success of endosymbiosis has largely depended on the regulation of endosymbiont OXPHOS. Several studies have presented cytochrome c oxidase as a key regulator of OXPHOS; for example, COX is the only complex of mammalian OXPHOS with known tissue-specific isoforms of nuclear encoded subunits. We here discuss current knowledge about the origin of nuclear encoded subunits and the appearance of different isozymes promoted by tissue and cellular environments such as hypoxia. We also review evidence for recent selective pressure acting on COX among vertebrates, particularly in primate lineages, and discuss the unique pattern of co-evolution between the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. Finally, even though the addition of nuclear encoded subunits was a major event in eukaryotic COX evolution, this does not lead to emergence of a more efficient COX, as might be expected from an anthropocentric point of view, for the "higher" organism possessing large brains and muscles. The main function of these subunits appears to be "only" to control the activity of the mitochondrial subunits. We propose that this control function is an as yet under appreciated key point of evolution. Moreover, the importance of regulating energy supply may have caused the addition of subunits encoded by the nucleus in a process comparable to a "domestication scenario" such that the host tends to control more and more tightly the ancestral activity of COX performed by the mtDNA encoded subunits.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCell NucleusDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IVHumansModels, GeneticOxidative PhosphorylationOxygenProtein SubunitsDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IVOxygenProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID21802404
PMCPMC3923406
OpenAlexW2227933859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.