ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2011
Revised guidelines for cardiovascular risk management - time to stop medication? A practice-based intervention study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Withdrawal of antihypertensive medication: a systematic review.Journal of hypertension · 2017Pooled it
- Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review.Drugs & aging · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- A Digitally Enabled Combined Lifestyle Intervention for Weight Loss: Pilot Study in a Dutch General Population Cohort.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Effect of a Digitally-Enabled, Preventive Health Program on Blood Pressure in an Adult, Dutch General Population Cohort: An Observational Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Observational
- Understanding deprescribing of preventive cardiovascular medication: a Q-methodology study in patients.Patient preference and adherence · 2017Article
- Older peoples' attitudes regarding polypharmacy, statin use and willingness to have statins deprescribed in Australia.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015Article
- Review of deprescribing processes and development of an evidence-based, patient-centred deprescribing process.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
- Evidence of lifestyle modification in the management of hypercholesterolemia.Current cardiology reviews · 2013Review
- Article
- Revised guidelines for cardiovascular risk management.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to the new Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management, patients with a low risk of cardiovascular mortality may have insufficient benefit to warrant medication. Therefore, numerous patients per general practice may be treated unnecessarily.
aimTo explore the feasibility and consequences of a re-evaluation programme for patients without target organ damage who were treated for hypertension and/or hypercholesterolaemia. DESIGN AND
settingPractice-based intervention study in six general practices.
methodPatients treated for hypertension and/or hypercholesterolaemia without target organ damage (n = 833) were invited to re-evaluate their cardiovascular risk and were advised whether or not to stop medication. Patients who discontinued medication were followed for 6 months. To determine indicators for successful stopping, logistic regression analyses were performed, and differences between practices were analysed.
resultsAbout two-thirds of the patients were re-evaluated and 61% of them had a low calculated risk, especially younger patients, females, and non-smokers. Of these, 42% were advised to stop medication, especially younger patients and non-smokers. Of those who discontinued medication, 40% had restarted within 6 months. After 6 months, 80 of the 833 patients (9.6%) had not restarted medication. There were no important side effects related to stopping medication.
conclusionOver 50% of patients without target organ damage treated for hypertension and/or hypercholesterolaemia may have insufficient benefit to warrant medication. Younger patients, females, and non-smokers in particular are more likely to have an insufficient indication for medication. GPs' and nurse practitioners' views seem to play a role in advising to stop or to restart medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.