Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21801415›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2011

Systems biology of bacterial nitrogen fixation: high-throughput technology and its integrative description with constraint-based modeling.

Osbaldo Resendis-Antonio, Magdalena Hernández, Emmanuel Salazar, Sandra Contreras, Gabriel Martínez Batallar, Yolanda Mora, Sergio Encarnación

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of the Formation of Plant-Microbial Interface inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How Rhizobia Adapt to the Nodule Environment.Journal of bacteriology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quantitative models of nitrogen-fixing organisms.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Nitrogen Cycling Potential of a Grassland Litter Microbial Community.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Osbaldo Resendis-AntonioPrograma de Genomica Funcional de Procariotes, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas-UNAM, Av, Universidad s/n, Col, Chamilpa, Cuernavaca Morelos, C,P, 62210, Mexico. resendis@ccg.unam.mx
Magdalena Hernández
Emmanuel Salazar
Sandra Contreras
Gabriel Martínez Batallar
Yolanda Mora
Sergio Encarnación
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MXCenter for Genomic Science · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial nitrogen fixation is the biological process by which atmospheric nitrogen is uptaken by bacteroids located in plant root nodules and converted into ammonium through the enzymatic activity of nitrogenase. In practice, this biological process serves as a natural form of fertilization and its optimization has significant implications in sustainable agricultural programs. Currently, the advent of high-throughput technology supplies with valuable data that contribute to understanding the metabolic activity during bacterial nitrogen fixation. This undertaking is not trivial, and the development of computational methods useful in accomplishing an integrative, descriptive and predictive framework is a crucial issue to decoding the principles that regulated the metabolic activity of this biological process.

resultsIn this work we present a systems biology description of the metabolic activity in bacterial nitrogen fixation. This was accomplished by an integrative analysis involving high-throughput data and constraint-based modeling to characterize the metabolic activity in Rhizobium etli bacteroids located at the root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris (bean plant). Proteome and transcriptome technologies led us to identify 415 proteins and 689 up-regulated genes that orchestrate this biological process. Taking into account these data, we: 1) extended the metabolic reconstruction reported for R. etli; 2) simulated the metabolic activity during symbiotic nitrogen fixation; and 3) evaluated the in silico results in terms of bacteria phenotype. Notably, constraint-based modeling simulated nitrogen fixation activity in such a way that 76.83% of the enzymes and 69.48% of the genes were experimentally justified. Finally, to further assess the predictive scope of the computational model, gene deletion analysis was carried out on nine metabolic enzymes. Our model concluded that an altered metabolic activity on these enzymes induced different effects in nitrogen fixation, all of these in qualitative agreement with observations made in R. etli and other Rhizobiaceas.

conclusionsIn this work we present a genome scale study of the metabolic activity in bacterial nitrogen fixation. This approach leads us to construct a computational model that serves as a guide for 1) integrating high-throughput data, 2) describing and predicting metabolic activity, and 3) designing experiments to explore the genotype-phenotype relationship in bacterial nitrogen fixation.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMass SpectrometryMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMicroarray AnalysisNitrogen FixationPhaseolusProteomicsRhizobium etliRoot Nodules, PlantSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID21801415
PMCPMC3164627
OpenAlexW2039499496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.