ArticleInternational journal of radiation biology2011
Radiation injury treatment network (RITN): healthcare professionals preparing for a mass casualty radiological or nuclear incident.
Article in International journal of radiation biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- An ACMT Network of Medical Toxicology Clinics (NMTC): A Proposed Collaboration of Medical Toxicologists to Meet National Emergency Preparedness Needs.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026Article
- Radiation-induced multi-organ injury.International journal of radiation biology · 2024Article
- Use of Growth Factors and Other Cytokines for Treatment of Injuries During a Radiation Public Health Emergency.Radiation research · 2019Article
- Cellular Therapies for Treatment of Radiation Injury: Report from a NIH/NIAID and IRSN Workshop.Radiation research · 2017Article
- Disaster Preparedness and Response for the Burn Mass Casualty Incident in the Twenty-first Century.Clinics in plastic surgery · 2017Review
- Public health and medical preparedness for a nuclear detonation: the nuclear incident medical enterprise.Health physics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo describe the history, composition, and activities of the Radiation Injury Treatment Network (RITN). The Radiation Injury Treatment Network® is a cooperative effort of the National Marrow Donor Program and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. The goals of RITN are to educate hematologists, oncologists, and stem cell transplant practitioners about their potential involvement in the response to a radiation incident and provide treatment expertise. Injuries to the marrow system readily occur when a victim is exposed to ionising radiation. This focus therefore leverages the expertise of these specialists who are accustomed to providing the intensive supportive care required by patients with a suppressed marrow function. Following a radiological incident, RITN centres may be asked to: Accept patient transfers to their institutions; provide treatment expertise to practitioners caring for victims at other centres; travel to other centres to provide medical expertise; or provide data on victims treated at their centres. Moving forward, it is crucial that we develop a coordinated interdisciplinary approach in planning for and responding to radiological and nuclear incidents. The ongoing efforts of radiation biologists, radiation oncologists, and health physicists can and should complement the efforts of RITN and government agencies.
conclusionRITN serves as a vital partner in preparedness and response efforts for potential radiological and nuclear incidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.