Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21801022›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genomics and human genetics2011

RNA-Mediated Epigenetic Programming of Genome Rearrangements.

Mariusz Nowacki, Keerthi Shetty, Laura F Landweber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Origins and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariusz NowackiInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland. mariusz.nowacki@izb.unibe.ch
Keerthi Shetty
Laura F Landweber
Princeton University · USUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

UNDERSTANDING COMPLEX GENE EDITING SYSTEMS IN PROTISTSR01GM059708 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI LANDWEBER, LAURA F · 1999 to 2016
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM59708NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA, normally thought of as a conduit in gene expression, has a novel mode of action in ciliated protozoa. Maternal RNA templates provide both an organizing guide for DNA rearrangements and a template that can transport somatic mutations to the next generation. This opportunity for RNA-mediated genome rearrangement and DNA repair is profound in the ciliate Oxytricha, which deletes 95% of its germline genome during development in a process that severely fragments its chromosomes and then sorts and reorders the hundreds of thousands of pieces remaining. Oxytricha's somatic nuclear genome is therefore an epigenome formed through RNA templates and signals arising from the previous generation. Furthermore, this mechanism of RNA-mediated epigenetic inheritance can function across multiple generations, and the discovery of maternal template RNA molecules has revealed new biological roles for RNA and has hinted at the power of RNA molecules to sculpt genomic information in cells.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsGenome, ProtozoanAlveolataOxytrichaRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID21801022
PMCPMC3518427
OpenAlexW2164976005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.