Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21801018›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of psychology2012

Learning to see words.

Brian A Wandell, Andreas M Rauschecker, Jason D Yeatman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of psychology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Atypical characteristic changes of surface morphology and structural covariance network in developmental dyslexia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Stroke disconnectome decodes reading networks.Brain structure & function · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian A WandellPsychology Department, Stanford University, California 94305, USA. wandell@stanford.edu
Andreas M Rauschecker
Jason D Yeatman

Funding

HUMAN VISUAL PATHWAYS DEVELOPMENT AND SKILLED READINGR01EY015000 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANDELL, BRIAN A · 2003 to 2012
$4.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skilled reading requires recognizing written words rapidly; functional neuroimaging research has clarified how the written word initiates a series of responses in visual cortex. These responses are communicated to circuits in ventral occipitotemporal (VOT) cortex that learn to identify words rapidly. Structural neuroimaging has further clarified aspects of the white matter pathways that communicate reading signals between VOT and language systems. We review this circuitry, its development, and its deficiencies in poor readers. This review emphasizes data that measure the cortical responses and white matter pathways in individual subjects rather than group differences. Such methods have the potential to clarify why a child has difficulty learning to read and to offer guidance about the interventions that may be useful for that child.

Indexed as

ReadingFunctional NeuroimagingHumansLanguageLearningVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID21801018
PMCPMC3228885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.