Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21801012›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2011

Neurogenesis at the brain-cerebrospinal fluid interface.

Maria K Lehtinen, Christopher A Walsh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Brain development and bioenergetic changes.Neurobiology of disease · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria K LehtinenDivision of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. maria.lehtinen@childrens.harvard.edu
Christopher A Walsh
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

SYNAPTIC MECHANISMS IN HIPPOCAMPAL EPILEPTOGENESISP30HD018655 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI POMEROY, SCOTT LOREN · 1985 to 2015
$26.2M
Cell Identity Determination In Human Brain: Somatic Mutation and Cell LineageR01NS032457 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Alice Eunjung Lee, Christopher A. Walsh · 1995 to 2026
$12.7M
HUMAN EPILEPSY GENETICS--NEURONAL MIGRATION DISORDERSR01NS035129 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WALSH, CHRISTOPHER A. · 1997 to 2023
$9.5M
Cerebrospinal fluid proteome mediated signaling in the developing CNSK99NS072192 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEHTINEN, MARIA · 2010 to 2011
$180k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS P30 HD018655NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD18655NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS072192NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032457NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035129NINDS NIH HHS R01NS35129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral cortical progenitor cells can be classified into several different types, and each progenitor type integrates cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic cues to regulate neurogenesis. On one hand, cell-intrinsic mechanisms that depend upon appropriate apical-basal polarity are established by adherens junctions and apical complex proteins and are particularly important in progenitors with apical processes contacting the lateral ventricle. The apical protein complexes themselves are concentrated at the ventricular surface, and apical complex proteins regulate mitotic spindle orientation and cell fate. On the other hand, remarkably little is known about how cell-extrinsic cues signal to progenitors and couple with cell-intrinsic mechanisms to instruct neurogenesis. Recent research shows that the cerebrospinal fluid, which contacts apical progenitors at the ventricular surface and bathes the apical complex of these cells, provides growth- and survival-promoting cues for neural progenitor cells in developing and adult brain. This review addresses how the apical-basal polarity of progenitor cells regulates cell fate and allows progenitors to sample diffusible signals distributed by the cerebrospinal fluid. We also review several classes of signaling factors that the cerebrospinal fluid distributes to the developing brain to instruct neurogenesis.

Indexed as

Adherens JunctionsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell PolarityCell ProliferationCerebral CortexCerebrospinal FluidHedgehog ProteinsHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNeurogenesisNeuronsReceptors, NotchSignal TransductionStem CellsHedgehog ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsReceptors, NotchTretinoin

Identifiers

PMID21801012
PMCPMC3777264
OpenAlexW2136019653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.