Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21800752›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Secondhand smoke exposure in young people and parental rules against smoking at home and in the car.

Kathleen B Cartmell, Christine Miner, Matthew J Carpenter, Camelia S Vitoc, Sharon Biggers, Georgiana Onicescu, Elizabeth G Hill, Brenda C Nickerson, Anthony J Alberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Subnational exposure to secondhand smoke in Iran from 1990 to 2013: a systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen B CartmellMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Medicine, Hollings Cancer Center, 86 Jonathan Lucas St., Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Christine Miner
Matthew J Carpenter
Camelia S Vitoc
Sharon Biggers
Georgiana Onicescu
Elizabeth G Hill
Brenda C Nickerson
Anthony J Alberg
MUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USSouth Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSecondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is an important cause of morbidity in children. We assessed the impact of family rules about smoking in the home and car on SHS exposure prevalence in students in grades six to 12.

methodsWe studied never-smoking young people (n = 1,698) in the random sample cross-sectional South Carolina Youth Tobacco Survey, a 2006 survey of middle and high school students in South Carolina.

resultsOverall, 40% of the students reported SHS exposure in either the home or car in the past week; among these, 85% reported exposure in cars. Subsequent analyses focused on students who lived with a smoker (n = 602). Compared with those whose families prohibited smoking in the home or car, SHS exposure prevalence was 30% (p < 0.0001) higher for households with smoke-free rules for only one place (home or car) and 36% (p < 0.0001) higher for households with no rules. Compared with students from households with strict rules, SHS exposure prevalence was 48% greater (p < 0.0001) among those with only partial rules against smoking in the home or car, and 55% (p < 0.0001) greater among those from households with no rules. Similarly, compared with students with strict family rules for home and car that were adhered to, SHS exposure prevalence was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) among students when only one or no rules were followed.

conclusionsYoung people from families that made and enforced strong rules against smoking in homes and cars were much less likely to report SHS exposure. Parents would be wise to endorse and enforce strong smoke-free policies for both homes and cars.

Indexed as

AutomobilesHousingAdolescentAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansMalePolicySex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID21800752
PMCPMC3115217
OpenAlexW2140291570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.