Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21800123›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2012

Evaluation of a PCR protocol for sensitive detection of Giardia intestinalis in human faeces.

Amy J Asher, Liette S Waldron, Michelle L Power

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Epidemiology ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy J AsherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. amy.asher@mq.edu.au
Liette S Waldron
Michelle L Power
Macquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giardia intestinalis is a protozoan parasite and a human pathogen. It is a leading cause of human diarrheal disease and a significant cause of morbidity worldwide. At the molecular level, G. intestinalis is a species complex, consisting of genetic assemblages (A to G) and sub-assemblage strains. The genotypes that cause human disease have been characterised to assemblages A and B, and include strains AI, AII, BIII and BIV. PCR amplification of diagnostic loci is used to genotype samples and is required to understand different transmission cycles within communities. A multi-locus approach is required for validation of Giardia genotyping and molecular diagnostic techniques that are efficient across numerous loci have not been established. This study evaluated several published protocols for the 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) and glutamate dehydrogenase genes (gdh) genes. Assays were compared using spiked faecal samples and by measuring the concentration of DNA generated following DNA extraction and PCR amplification. An optimal molecular method for G. intestinalis identification was established from direct DNA extraction of faecal material and GC-rich PCR chemistry. The protocol was applied to 50 clinical samples and produced PCR success rates of 90% and 94% at the 18S rRNA and gdh loci. Cyst concentration prior to DNA extraction was not necessary, and the optimal protocol was highly sensitive and an efficient method for testing clinical samples.

Indexed as

FecesGiardia lambliaGiardiasisGlutamate DehydrogenaseHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesParasitologyPolymerase Chain ReactionProtozoan ProteinsRNA, ProtozoanRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSensitivity and SpecificityGlutamate DehydrogenaseProtozoan ProteinsRNA, ProtozoanRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID21800123
OpenAlexW2089638418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.