Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21800070›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2012

Validity and reliability of postpartum morbidity questionnaires in Benin.

Ann Montgomery, Sourou Goufodji, Lydie Kanhonou, Eusebe Alihonou, Simon Collin, Véronique Filippi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann MontgomeryInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. ann.montgomery@utoronto.ca
Sourou Goufodji
Lydie Kanhonou
Eusebe Alihonou
Simon Collin
Véronique Filippi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the validity and reliability of midwife-administered postpartum questionnaires in home and clinic settings. Women identified prospectively before or following hospital delivery (n = 476), September 2004-January 2005, were re-contacted at 6 months postpartum for home interview and medical examination. Reliability was measured by comparing women's responses to the same questions at home and in clinic interviews. Validity was measured by comparing questionnaire responses with results of medical examination. Reliability of responses to questions comparing home and clinic interview was very good (κ > 0.6) for resumption of menstruation and occurrence of hemorrhoids, moderate (0.4 < κ ≤ 0.6) for weight loss and incontinence, and poor (κ ≤ 0.4) for burning sensation or pain on urination and exhaustion or fatigue. The home and clinic interviews had poor validity for detecting common postpartum morbidities: anaemia (sensitivity 33.7%, specificity 65.7%), urinary incontinence (5.1, 98.1%), urinary tract infection (2.1, 94.5%), prolapse (18.2, 91.2%); but good validity for hemorrhoids (71.4, 86.9%). In this setting, questionnaire-based interviews were neither reliable nor valid tools for measuring morbidity at 6 months postpartum. A medical examination is required to identify and measure the levels of morbidity up to 6 months postpartum.

Indexed as

MorbidityPostpartum PeriodQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultBeninFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterviews as TopicMaternal WelfareProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.