ArticlePloS one2011
Methods for structuring scientific knowledge from many areas related to aging research.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of glycine administration on the characteristics of physiological systems in human adults: A systematic review.GeroScience · 2024Pooled it
- Calorie restriction mimetics against aging and inflammation.Biogerontology · 2025Review
- Analysis of COVID-19 Death Cases Using Machine Learning.SN computer science · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence Based Approaches to Identify Molecular Determinants of Exceptional Health and Life Span-An Interdisciplinary Workshop at the National Institute on Aging.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2019Review
- Data aggregation at the level of molecular pathways improves stability of experimental transcriptomic and proteomic data.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2017Article
- Geroprotectors: A Unified Concept and Screening Approaches.Aging and disease · 2017Review
- Article
- Deep biomarkers of human aging: Application of deep neural networks to biomarker development.Aging · 2016Article
- Aging Chart: a community resource for rapid exploratory pathway analysis of age-related processes.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Editorial: Should We Treat Aging as a Disease? Academic, Pharmaceutical, Healthcare Policy, and Pension Fund Perspectives.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Article
- Molecular functions of human endogenous retroviruses in health and disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015Review
- Article
- Screening and personalizing nootropic drugs and cognitive modulator regimens in silico.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
- Longevity expectations in the pension fund, insurance, and employee benefits industries.Psychology research and behavior management · 2015Article
- Article
- Signaling pathways activation profiles make better markers of cancer than expression of individual genes.Oncotarget · 2014Article
- On multilabel classification methods of incompletely labeled biomedical text data.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2014Article
- The OncoFinder algorithm for minimizing the errors introduced by the high-throughput methods of transcriptome analysis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging and age-related disease represents a substantial quantity of current natural, social and behavioral science research efforts. Presently, no centralized system exists for tracking aging research projects across numerous research disciplines. The multidisciplinary nature of this research complicates the understanding of underlying project categories, the establishment of project relations, and the development of a unified project classification scheme. We have developed a highly visual database, the International Aging Research Portfolio (IARP), available at AgingPortfolio.org to address this issue. The database integrates information on research grants, peer-reviewed publications, and issued patent applications from multiple sources. Additionally, the database uses flexible project classification mechanisms and tools for analyzing project associations and trends. This system enables scientists to search the centralized project database, to classify and categorize aging projects, and to analyze the funding aspects across multiple research disciplines. The IARP is designed to provide improved allocation and prioritization of scarce research funding, to reduce project overlap and improve scientific collaboration thereby accelerating scientific and medical progress in a rapidly growing area of research. Grant applications often precede publications and some grants do not result in publications, thus, this system provides utility to investigate an earlier and broader view on research activity in many research disciplines. This project is a first attempt to provide a centralized database system for research grants and to categorize aging research projects into multiple subcategories utilizing both advanced machine algorithms and a hierarchical environment for scientific collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.