Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21799492›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2011

Metabolite extraction from suspension-cultured mammalian cells for global metabolite profiling.

Christopher A Sellick, Rasmus Hansen, Gill M Stephens, Royston Goodacre, Alan J Dickson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher A SellickFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rasmus Hansen
Gill M Stephens
Royston Goodacre
Alan J Dickson

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E005985/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G023581/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G023581/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolite profiling of industrially important suspension-cultured mammalian cells is being increasingly used for rational improvement of bioprocesses. This requires the generation of global metabolite profiles that cover a broad range of metabolites and that are representative of the cells at the time of sampling. The protocol described here is a validated method for recovery of physiologically relevant amounts of key metabolites from suspension-cultured mammalian cells. The method is a two-step process consisting of initial quenching of the cells (to stop cellular metabolism and allow isolation of the cells) followed by extraction of the metabolites. The cells are quenched in 60% methanol supplemented with 0.85% (wt/vol) ammonium bicarbonate at -40 °C. Metabolites are then extracted from the quenched cells using two 100% methanol extractions followed by a single water extraction. Metabolite samples generated using this protocol are amenable to analysis by mass spectrometry-based techniques (e.g., gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), NMR spectroscopy and enzymatic assays.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesMetabolomeAnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID21799492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.