ReviewCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care.
Review in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- A mixed methods systematic review of the effects of patient online self-diagnosing in the 'smart-phone society' on the healthcare professional-patient relationship and medical authority.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Pooled it
- Patient priorities and the doorknob phenomenon in primary care: Can technology improve disclosure of patient stressors?Patient education and counseling · 2018Trial
- Improving an electronic system for measuring PROs in routine oncology practice.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2016Trial
- When using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice, the measure matters: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of oncology practice · 2014Trial
- Evaluation of the accuracy, quality, and readability of large language models on local anesthesia and general anesthesia-sedation in dentistry.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Treatment pathways of lung cancer patients in the Czech Republic: insights from administrative claims data.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Automated framework for comprehensive usability analysis of healthcare websites using web parsing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting patients' sentiments about medications using artificial intelligence techniques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Patients' Use of Electronic Health Records Facilitates Patient-Centered Communication: Findings From the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Quality of interaction between clinicians and artificial intelligence systems. A systematic review.Future healthcare journal · 2024Review
- Electronic Decision-Making Tool for Smoking Cessation (Pare de Fumar Conosco) Versus Standard of Care: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Value in health regional issues · 2024Article
- Integrating sexual and reproductive health into pre-travel consultations.Journal of travel medicine · 2024Review
- Implementation of Patient-Centered Care by Athletic Training Students during Clinical Experiences: A Report from the Association of Athletic Training Education Research Network.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The Integration of Patient-Centered Care and the Biopsychosocial Model by Athletic Trainers in the Secondary School Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Athletic Trainer's Varying Levels of Awareness and Use of Disablement Model Frameworks: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Personalized Telehealth: Redesigning Complex Care Delivery for the 65+ During the COVID Pandemic: a Survey of Patients, Caregivers, and Health-care Providers.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2023Article
- The development and impact of adopting electronic health records in the United States: A brief overview and implications for nursing education.Health care science · 2022Article
- Effect of social media interventions on the education and communication among patients with cancer: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Patient-centered education in dyslipidemia management: a systematic review.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2022Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-centered care is an important aspect of high-quality care. Health informatics, particularly advances in technology, has the potential to facilitate, or detract from, patient-centered cancer care. Informatics can provide a mechanism for patients to provide their clinician(s) with critical information and to share information with family, friends, and other patients. This information may enable patients to exert greater control over their own care. Clinicians may use information systems (e.g., electronic medical records) to coordinate care and share information with other clinicians. Patients and clinicians may use communication tools and information resources to interact with one another in new ways. Caution in using new information resources is warranted to avoid reliance on biased or inappropriate data, and clinicians may need to direct patients to appropriate information resources. Perhaps the greatest challenge for both patients and providers is identifying information that is high quality and that enhances (and does not impede) their interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.