ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2011
A novel assay for evaluating fragile X locus repeats.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A Set of Assays for the Comprehensive Analysis of FMR1 Alleles in the Fragile X-Related Disorders.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have developed a novel fragile X locus repeat assay that is a simple and high-throughput method that, with clinical validation, may be suitable for screening. It uses amplification of the FMR1 trinucleotide repeat region, followed by a hybridization assay to quantify the number of repeats in the amplicons. To our knowledge, this is the first repeat-counting assay that uses fluorescent signals rather than electrophoresis or mass spectrometry as the signaling mechanism. We also report the development of a simple microfluidic electrophoresis reflex test that uses the same amplicons and reduces the need for Southern blots to differentiate homozygous female normal samples from full mutations. The new assay, which is based on a suspension-array hybridization method, was tested on a series of male and female reference samples spanning the range from normal to full mutations. It was also tested on DNA from 1008 dried blood spot samples from pregnant women in their first trimester. The hybridization assay identified 51 of those as potentially expanded alleles of ≥45 repeats or as intermediate or higher in FMR1 repeat classification. Of these screen-positive samples, eight were confirmed by microfluidic electrophoresis as premutations consisting of ≥55 repeats. The FMR1 repeat assay is straightforward to run in high throughput, and the results are in the form of numerical ratios for ease of initial interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.