Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21798054›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2011

In vivo efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine against uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Central Ethiopia.

Jimee Hwang, Bereket H Alemayehu, David Hoos, Zenebe Melaku, Samuel G Tekleyohannes, Takele Teshi, Sintayehu G Birhanu, Leykun Demeke, Kedir Gobena, Moges Kassa and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01052584 (Ethiopia In-vivo Efficacy Study 2009), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01052584 nacompletednot on this map

Ethiopia In-vivo Efficacy Study 2009: Evaluating the Efficacy of Artemether-lumefantrine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Infection and Either Artemether-lumefantrine or Chloroquine for P. Vivax Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2009 to 2010Enrolled354ConditionsMalariaArmsChloroquine- P. vivax, Artemether-Lumefantrine: P. vivax, Artemether-lumefantrine: P. falciparum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. In vivo efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine against uncomplicatedTherapeutics and clinical risk management · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Biomedicines · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jimee HwangU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. jhwang@cdc.gov
Bereket H Alemayehu
David Hoos
Zenebe Melaku
Samuel G Tekleyohannes
Takele Teshi
Sintayehu G Birhanu
Leykun Demeke
Kedir Gobena
Moges Kassa
Daddi Jima
Richard Reithinger
Henry Nettey
Michael Green
Joseph L Malone
S Patrick Kachur
Scott Filler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn vivo efficacy assessments of the first-line treatments for Plasmodium falciparum malaria are essential for ensuring effective case management. In Ethiopia, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) has been the first-line treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria since 2004.

methodsBetween October and November 2009, we conducted a 42-day, single arm, open label study of AL for P. falciparum in individuals >6 months of age at two sites in Oromia State, Ethiopia. Eligible patients who had documented P. falciparum mono-infection were enrolled and followed according to the standard 2009 World Health Organization in vivo drug efficacy monitoring protocol. The primary and secondary endpoints were PCR uncorrected and corrected cure rates, as measured by adequate clinical and parasitological response on days 28 and 42, respectively.

resultsOf 4426 patients tested, 120 with confirmed falciparum malaria were enrolled and treated with AL. Follow-up was completed for 112 patients at day 28 and 104 patients at day 42. There was one late parasitological failure, which was classified as undetermined after genotyping. Uncorrected cure rates at both day 28 and 42 for the per protocol analysis were 99.1% (95% CI 95.1-100.0); corrected cure rates at both day 28 and 42 were 100.0%. Uncorrected cure rates at day 28 and 42 for the intention to treat analysis were 93.3% (95% CI 87.2-97.1) and 86.6% (95% CI 79.1-92.1), respectively, while the corrected cure rates at day 28 and 42 were 94.1% (95% CI 88.2-97.6) and 87.3% (95% CI 79.9-92.7), respectively. Using survival analysis, the unadjusted cure rate was 99.1% and 100.0% adjusted by genotyping for day 28 and 42, respectively. Eight P. falciparum patients (6.7%) presented with Plasmodium vivax infection during follow-up and were excluded from the per protocol analysis. Only one patient had persistent parasitaemia at day 3. No serious adverse events were reported, with cough and nausea/vomiting being the most common adverse events.

conclusionsAL remains a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in the study setting after several years of universal access to AL. A high rate of parasitaemia with P. vivax possibly from relapse or new infection was observed.

trial registrationNCT01052584.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsChildChild, PreschoolDNA, ProtozoanDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesEthiopiaFemaleFluorenesHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalePlasmodium falciparumAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsDNA, ProtozoanDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluorenes

Identifiers

PMID21798054
PMCPMC3163628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.