Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21796439›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2012

A single-arm pilot phase II study of gefitinib and irinotecan in children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma.

Wayne L Furman, Lisa M McGregor, M Beth McCarville, Mihaela Onciu, Andrew M Davidoff, Sandy Kovach, Dana Hawkins, Valerie McPherson, Peter J Houghton, Catherine A Billups and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel phage display-derived neuroblastoma-targeting peptides potentiate the effect of drug nanocarriers in preclinical settings.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cell survival signaling in neuroblastoma.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wayne L FurmanDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105, USA. wayne.furman@stjude.org
Lisa M McGregor
M Beth McCarville
Mihaela Onciu
Andrew M Davidoff
Sandy Kovach
Dana Hawkins
Valerie McPherson
Peter J Houghton
Catherine A Billups
Jianrong Wu
Clinton F Stewart
Victor M Santana
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USNationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
XENOGRAFT STUDIESP01CA023099 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI HOUGHTON, PETER J · 1985 to 2011
$22.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA23099NCI NIH HHS P01 CA023099NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765PHS HHS P30 21765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGefitinib potently inhibits neuroblastoma proliferation in vitro, and the gefitinib/irinotecan combination shows greater than additive activity against neuroblastoma xenografts. This Phase II pilot study estimated the rate of response to two courses of intravenous irinotecan plus oral gefitinib in children with untreated high-risk neuroblastoma.

methodsTwo courses of irinotecan [15 mg/m(2)/day (daily ×5)×2] were combined with 12 daily doses of gefitinib (112.5 mg/m(2)/day). Response was assessed after 6 weeks. A response rate >55% was sought.

resultsOf the 23 children enrolled, 19 were evaluable for response. Median age at diagnosis was 3.1 years (range, 18 days-12.7 years). Most patients were older than 24 months (n = 20; 87%), male (n = 18; 78%), white (n = 16; 70%), had INSS 4 disease (n = 19; 83%), and had adrenal primary tumors (n = 18; 78%); nine patients (39%) had amplified tumor MYCN. The toxicity of gefitinib/irinotecan was mild and reversible (nausea, 5/20; diarrhea, 8/20; vomiting, 7/20). Five patients had partial responses; 9 others had a 23%-60% decrease in primary tumor volume and/or improved MIBG scans or decreased bone or bone marrow tumor burden. Median (range) systemic irinotecan exposure (AUC) was 283 ng/ml*hr (range, 163-890 ng/ml*hr) and 28 ng/ml*hr (3.6-297 ng/ml*hr) for the active metabolite, SN-38. No relation was observed between response and tumor expression of EGFR, MRP2-4, ABCG2, and Pgp.

conclusionsAlthough the gefitinib/irinotecan combination was very tolerable and induced responses, it was not sufficiently active to warrant further investigation. Initial investigational studies of this type can preclude the necessity for larger, longer, and costlier trials.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGefitinibHomovanillic AcidHumansImmunohistochemistryInfantInfant, NewbornIrinotecanL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleNeoplasm ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinGefitinibHomovanillic AcidIrinotecanL-Lactate DehydrogenaseNeoplasm ProteinsQuinazolinesVanilmandelic Acid

Identifiers

PMID21796439
PMCPMC3232294
OpenAlexW2021598375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.