Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21795976›Full record

ArticleCornea2011

The role of atopy in corneal graft survival in keratoconus.

Jacob K Thomas, D Aaron Guel, Theodore S Thomas, H Dwight Cavanagh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cornea, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Systemic Associations with Keratoconus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Impact of allergy and atopy on the risk of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2016
    Article
  6. Corneal allograft reaction associated with nonocular inflammation.Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO · 2014
    Review
  7. Ocular allergy and keratoconus.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2013
    Review
  8. The Genetics of Keratoconus: A Review.Reproductive system & sexual disorders : current research · 2012
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob K ThomasDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390-9057, USA.
D Aaron Guel
Theodore S Thomas
H Dwight Cavanagh
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY020799 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI NIEDERKORN, JERRY · 2010 to 2016
$4.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY020799NEI NIH HHS P30 EY020799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the prevalence of endothelial rejection episodes and the probability of graft survival after initial and repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with keratoconus with and without atopy.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients receiving PK for keratoconus at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas from 1988 to 2009. Inclusion criteria involved those with both an International Classification of Diseases-9 code for keratoconus and a Current Procedural Terminology code for PK based on a computer database search. Patients younger than 18 years were excluded. These records were then reviewed for a history of atopic disorders. The main outcome measures included the prevalence of endothelial rejection episodes and the probability of graft survival. The probability of corneal graft survival in patients with and without a history of atopy was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsThere were 168 grafts in 122 patients. There were 66 (39.2%) and 102 (60.8%) grafts with and without a history of atopy, respectively. Bilateral first grafts were required in 32 patients, 14 and 18 patients with and without a history of atopy, respectively. The atopic and nonatopic groups had no significant differences with respect to age, preexisting ocular conditions, concomitant surgical procedures, and length of follow-up. Men received first grafts significantly more frequently than women in the nonatopic group (P = 0.029); however, there was no sex difference in repeat grafts. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of endothelial rejection episodes after the first (P = 0.716), second (P > 0.999), and third or further grafts (P > 0.999). Graft survival between the atopic and nonatopic groups did not differ significantly in the first (P = 0.881), second (P = 0.752), or third or further graft (P = 0.157). Among first grafts in the atopic group, no statistically significant difference in survival existed among patients analyzed with different manifestations of atopy (P = 0.061). One episode of allograft endothelial rejection created a statistically significant difference in ultimate graft survival probability in both the atopic (P = 0.003) and nonatopic (P = 0.002) groups.

conclusionsAmong patients with keratoconus receiving PK, there is no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of endothelial graft rejection episodes or probability of graft survival between patients with and without a clinical history of atopy.

Indexed as

Keratoplasty, PenetratingAdolescentAdultAgedCorneaFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansHypersensitivity, ImmediateKeratoconusMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProbabilityRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21795976
PMCPMC3482983
OpenAlexW2041481215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.