Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21795628›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Inhibition to excitation ratio regulates visual system responses and behavior in vivo.

Wanhua Shen, Caroline R McKeown, James A Demas, Hollis T Cline

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing circuit function in the developingFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Visual neurons recognize complex image transformations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Increased Reliability of Visually-Evoked Activity in Area V1 of the MECP2-Duplication Mouse Model of Autism.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Electrophysiological Recording for Study ofCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wanhua ShenThe Dorris Neuroscience Center, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Caroline R McKeown
James A Demas
Hollis T Cline
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Activity-dependent Development of Visual System DevelopmentR01EY011261 · NEI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CLINE, HOLLIS T. · 1996 to 2018
$11.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY011261NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The balance of inhibitory to excitatory (I/E) synaptic inputs is thought to control information processing and behavioral output of the central nervous system. We sought to test the effects of the decreased or increased I/E ratio on visual circuit function and visually guided behavior in Xenopus tadpoles. We selectively decreased inhibitory synaptic transmission in optic tectal neurons by knocking down the γ2 subunit of the GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)R) using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides or by expressing a peptide corresponding to an intracellular loop of the γ2 subunit, called ICL, which interferes with anchoring GABA(A)R at synapses. Recordings of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) and miniature excitatory PSCs (mEPSCs) showed that these treatments decreased the frequency of mIPSCs compared with control tectal neurons without affecting mEPSC frequency, resulting in an ∼50% decrease in the ratio of I/E synaptic input. ICL expression and γ2-subunit knockdown also decreased the ratio of optic nerve-evoked synaptic I/E responses. We recorded visually evoked responses from optic tectal neurons, in which the synaptic I/E ratio was decreased. Decreasing the synaptic I/E ratio in tectal neurons increased the variance of first spike latency in response to full-field visual stimulation, increased recurrent activity in the tectal circuit, enlarged spatial receptive fields, and lengthened the temporal integration window. We used the benzodiazepine, diazepam (DZ), to increase inhibitory synaptic activity. DZ increased optic nerve-evoked inhibitory transmission but did not affect evoked excitatory currents, resulting in an increase in the I/E ratio of ∼30%. Increasing the I/E ratio with DZ decreased the variance of first spike latency, decreased spatial receptive field size, and lengthened temporal receptive fields. Sequential recordings of spikes and excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to the same visual stimuli demonstrated that decreasing or increasing the I/E ratio disrupted input/output relations. We assessed the effect of an altered I/E ratio on a visually guided behavior that requires the optic tectum. Increasing and decreasing I/E in tectal neurons blocked the tectally mediated visual avoidance behavior. Because ICL expression, γ2-subunit knockdown, and DZ did not directly affect excitatory synaptic transmission, we interpret the results of our study as evidence that partially decreasing or increasing the ratio of I/E disrupts several measures of visual system information processing and visually guided behavior in an intact vertebrate.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAvoidance LearningBehavior, AnimalDiazepamEvoked Potentials, VisualExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsLarvaMaleNeural InhibitionNeuronsOligonucleotides, AntisensePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeDiazepamOligonucleotides, AntisenseReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID21795628
PMCPMC3214097
OpenAlexW2090502722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.