Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21795499›Full record

ReviewCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2011

Population sciences, translational research, and the opportunities and challenges for genomics to reduce the burden of cancer in the 21st century.

Muin J Khoury, Steven B Clauser, Andrew N Freedman, Elizabeth M Gillanders, Russ E Glasgow, William M P Klein, Sheri D Schully

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03130569 (Personalized Genomic Testing for Skin Cancer - Maximizing Utility and Reach), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03130569 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Personalized Genomic Testing for Skin Cancer - Maximizing Utility and Reach

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2015 to 2017Enrolled600ConditionsMelanoma (Skin)ArmsWeb-based Module Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Navigating the Intersection between Genomic Research and Clinical Practice.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Charting a future for epidemiologic training.Annals of epidemiology · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muin J KhouryOffice of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. muk1@CDC.GOV
Steven B Clauser
Andrew N Freedman
Elizabeth M Gillanders
Russ E Glasgow
William M P Klein
Sheri D Schully
National Cancer Institute · USOffice of Public Health Genomics · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS Y99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in genomics and related fields are promising tools for risk assessment, early detection, and targeted therapies across the entire cancer care continuum. In this commentary, we submit that this promise cannot be fulfilled without an enhanced translational genomics research agenda firmly rooted in the population sciences. Population sciences include multiple disciplines that are needed throughout the translational research continuum. For example, epidemiologic studies are needed not only to accelerate genomic discoveries and new biological insights into cancer etiology and pathogenesis, but to characterize and critically evaluate these discoveries in well-defined populations for their potential for cancer prediction, prevention and response to treatment. Behavioral, social, and communication sciences are needed to explore genomic-modulated responses to old and new behavioral interventions, adherence to therapies, decision making across the continuum, and effective use in health care. Implementation science, health services, outcomes research, comparative effectiveness research, and regulatory science are needed for moving validated genomic applications into practice and for measuring their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and unintended consequences. Knowledge synthesis, evidence reviews, and economic modeling of the effects of promising genomic applications will facilitate policy decisions and evidence-based recommendations. Several independent and multidisciplinary panels have recently made specific recommendations for enhanced research and policy infrastructure to inform clinical and population research for moving genomic innovations into the cancer care continuum. An enhanced translational genomics and population sciences agenda is urgently needed to fulfill the promise of genomics in reducing the burden of cancer.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePreventive MedicineEvidence-Based MedicineGenetics, PopulationGenomicsHistory, 21st CenturyHumansTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID21795499
PMCPMC3189274
OpenAlexW2155419451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.