Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21795423›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2011

Copy number imbalances between screen- and symptom-detected breast cancers and impact on disease-free survival.

A M Brewster, P Thompson, A A Sahin, K Do, M Edgerton, J L Murray, S Tsavachidis, R Zhou, Y Liu, L Zhang and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pan-cancer analysis of expressed somatic nucleotide variants in long intergenic non-coding RNA.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Copy number analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ with and without recurrence.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A M BrewsterDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77230, USA. abrewster@mdanderson.org
P Thompson
A A Sahin
K Do
M Edgerton
J L Murray
S Tsavachidis
R Zhou
Y Liu
L Zhang
G Mills
M Bondy

Funding

UTMDACC SPORE in Breast CancerP50CA116199 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BERRY, DONALD A · 2005 to 2009
$11.9M
Determinants of Breast Cancer SurvivalR01CA089608 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BONDY, MELISSA L · 2002 to 2006
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116199NCI NIH HHS P50CA116199NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089608NCI NIH HHS R01CA089608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening mammography results in the increased detection of indolent tumors. We hypothesized that screen- and symptom-detected tumors would show genotypic differences as copy number imbalances (CNI) that, in part, explain differences in the clinical behavior between screen- and symptom-detected breast tumors. We evaluated 850 women aged 40 and above diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1985 and 2000 with information available on method of tumor detection (screen vs. symptoms). CNIs in screen- and symptom-detected tumors were identified using high-density molecular inversion probe arrays. Cox proportional modeling was used to estimate the effect of method of tumor detection on disease-free survival after adjusting for age, stage, and the CNIs. The majority of tumors were symptom detected (n = 603) compared with screen detected (n = 247). Copy number gains in chromosomes 2p, 3q, 8q, 11p, and 20q were associated with method of breast cancer detection (P < 0.00001). We estimated that 32% and 63% of the survival advantage of screen detection was accounted for by age, stage, nuclear grade, and Ki67 in women aged 50 to 70 and aged 40 to 87, respectively. In each age category, an additional 20% of the survival advantage was accounted for by CNIs associated with method of detection. Specific CNIs differ between screen- and symptom-detected tumors and explain part of the survival advantage associated with screen-detected tumors. Measurement of tumor genotype has the potential to improve discrimination between indolent and aggressive screen-detected tumors and aids patient and physician decision making about use of surgical and adjuvant treatments.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsMass ScreeningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Grading

Identifiers

PMID21795423
PMCPMC3188338
OpenAlexW2065778511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.