Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21792626›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2011

A phase II neoadjuvant trial of anastrozole, fulvestrant, and gefitinib in patients with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.

Suleiman Massarweh, Yee L Tham, Jian Huang, Krystal Sexton, Heidi Weiss, Anna Tsimelzon, Amanda Beyer, Mothaffar Rimawi, Wei Yen Cai, Susan Hilsenbeck and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of targeted and immune combination therapies in a rat model of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Balancing Risk and Efficiency in Drug Development for Rare and Challenging Tumors: A New Paradigm for Glioma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suleiman MassarwehThe Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. massarweh@uky.edu
Yee L Tham
Jian Huang
Krystal Sexton
Heidi Weiss
Anna Tsimelzon
Amanda Beyer
Mothaffar Rimawi
Wei Yen Cai
Susan Hilsenbeck
Suzanne Fuqua
Richard Elledge
Baylor College of Medicine · USChildren's Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES IN BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENTP50CA058183 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI OSBORNE, C KENT · 1992 to 2012
$30.9M
Replication Stress and DNA Damage Response Drives ESR1 Mutant MetastasisR01CA072038 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI Suzanne AW Fuqua · 1996 to 2026
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058183NCI NIH HHS P50 CA58183NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer can be limited by the problem of resistance. Preclinical studies suggest that complete blockade of the estrogen receptor (ER) combined with inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor can overcome endocrine resistance. We tested this hypothesis in a phase II neoadjuvant trial of anastrozole and fulvestrant combined with gefitinib in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed ER-positive breast cancer. After a baseline tumor core biopsy, patients were randomized to receive anastrozole and fulvestrant or anastrozole, fulvestrant, and gefitinib (AFG) for 3 weeks. After a second biopsy at 3 weeks, all patients received AFG for 4 months and surgery was done if the tumor was operable. The primary endpoint was best clinical response by RECIST criteria and secondary endpoints were toxicity and change in biomarkers. The study closed after 15 patients were enrolled because of slow accrual. Median patient age was 67 years and median clinical tumor size was 7 cm. Four patients had metastatic disease present. Three patients withdrew before response was assessed. In the remaining 12 patients, there were two complete clinical responses (17%), three partial responses (25%), five had stable disease (41%), and two (17%) had progressive disease. Most common adverse events were rash in four patients, diarrhea in four, joint symptoms in three, and abnormal liver function tests in three. There were no grade 4 toxicities and all toxicities were reversible. At 3 weeks, cell proliferation as measured by Ki-67 was significantly reduced in the AFG group (P value = 0.01), with a parallel reduction in the expression of the Cyclin D1 (P value = 0.02). RNA microarray data showed a corresponding decrease in the expression of cell cycle genes. These results suggest that AFG was an effective neoadjuvant therapy and consistently reduced proliferation in ER-positive tumors.

Indexed as

AnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleCell CycleCyclin D1EstradiolFemaleFulvestrantGefitinibHumansKi-67 AntigenMaleMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNeoadjuvant TherapyAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCCND1 protein, humanCyclin D1EstradiolFulvestrantGefitinibKi-67 AntigenMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNitrilesOncogene Protein v-aktProto-Oncogene ProteinsQuinazolinesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID21792626
PMCPMC4477822
OpenAlexW2006910575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.