Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21792623›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2011

Differential phytate utilization in Candida species.

Paul Wai-Kei Tsang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Four new species ofMycoKeys · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. SARS-CoV-2 Post-Infection and Sepsis byTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  5. The Threat CalledJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Paul Wai-Kei TsangOral BioSciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, China. pwktsang@hku.hk
Prince Philip Dental Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to evaluate and characterize the phytase activity in different Candida species. A total of 113 Candida isolates representing eight species were examined for phytase activity by an agar plate assay using the calcium salt of phytic acid as the sole phosphorus source. A phytase-positive phenotype was identified by the formation of a clear halo around a fungal colony. Cell-bound differential phytase activity was observed in Candida isolates at inter- and intra-species levels. Although phytase activity was not affected by the supplementation of external phosphate in C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. glabrata, and C. kefyr, elevated phytase activity was evident in C. guilliermondii, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis in phosphate-free medium. Further characterization showed that, in general, relatively higher phytase activity was observed at more acidic pHs, and the phytase activity increased with incubation temperature, reaching a maximum at 55 or 65°C. Taken together, the findings demonstrated, for the first time, differential phytase activities in different Candida species. Phytase activity may be a contributing factor to fungal survival and proliferation within the human gastrointestinal tract, where nutrients are usually scarce.

Indexed as

6-PhytaseAgarCandidaCulture MediaEnzyme StabilityHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMouthPhosphatesPhytic AcidTemperature6-PhytaseAgarCulture MediaPhosphatesPhytic Acid

Identifiers

PMID21792623
OpenAlexW2149112303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.