Trial reportMedical & biological engineering & computing2011
Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation.
Trial report in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2014Pooled it
- Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2014Pooled it
- Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Trial
- Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Feasibility study of the assessment of upper limb function in children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy using an end-effector robotic device.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Automated planning and scheduling in robot-aided rehabilitation: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of intelligent robotic-assisted training system combined with repetitive facilitative exercise on upper limb motor function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Touchscreen-based assessment of upper limb kinematics after stroke: Reliability, validity and sensitivity to motor impairment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A fuzzy-logic approach for longitudinal assessment of patients' psychophysiological state: an application to upper-limb orthopedic robot-aided rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- AI Applications in Adult Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review Using AI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The effect of gravity on hand spatio-temporal kinematic features during functional movements.PloS one · 2024Article
- A Narrative Review on Multi-Domain Instrumental Approaches to Evaluate Neuromotor Function in Rehabilitation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Time course of recovery of different motor functions following a reproducible cortical infarction in non-human primates.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Data-Driven Classification of Human Movements in Virtual Reality-Based Serious Games: Preclinical Rehabilitation Study in Citizen Science.JMIR serious games · 2022Article
- Motor Ability Evaluation of the Upper Extremity with Point-To-Point Training Movement Based on End-Effector Robot-Assisted Training System.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Clinical validation of kinematic assessments of post-stroke upper limb movements with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Association Between Finger-to-Nose Kinematics and Upper Extremity Motor Function in Subacute Stroke: A Principal Component Analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Motor Function Assessment of Upper Limb in Stroke Patients.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Characterization and wearability evaluation of a fully portable wrist exoskeleton for unsupervised training after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper is focused on the multimodal analysis of patient performance, carried out by means of robotic technology and wearable sensors, and aims at providing quantitative measure of biomechanical and motion planning features of arm motor control following rehabilitation. Upper-limb robotic therapy was administered to 24 community-dwelling persons with chronic stroke. Performance indices on patient motor performance were computed from data recorded with the InMotion2 robotic machine and a magneto-inertial sensor. Motor planning issues were investigated by means of techniques of motion decomposition into submovements. A linear regression analysis was carried out to study correlation with clinical scales. Robotic outcome measures showed a significant improvement of kinematic motor performance; improvement of dynamic components was more significant in resistive motion and highly correlated with MP. The analysis of motion decomposition into submovements showed an important change with recovery of submovement number, amplitude and order, tending to patterns measured in healthy subjects. Preliminary results showed that arm biomechanical functions can be objectively measured by means of the proposed set of performance indices. Correlation with MP is high, while correlation with FM is moderate. Features related to motion planning strategies can be extracted from submovement analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21792622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.