Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21792601›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2011

The role of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency diagnosis in the era of midurethral sling.

Shahar Madjar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. 2024 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Female stress urinary incontinence.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shahar MadjarBell Hospital, Marquette County, MI 49849, USA. smadjar@yahoo.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The midurethral sling has gained popularity and is the most commonly used treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Whether intrinsic sphincteric deficiency (ISD) still should be used in the preoperative evaluation of patients with SUI and whether it should be considered as a predictor of success in patients undergoing a midurethral sling procedure and as a guide in the choice of surgical approach (retropubic vs transobturator) remain controversial. This article reviews and discusses the definitions of ISD and the latest research into the role of ISD determination in the era of the midurethral sling.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansSuburethral SlingsUrethraUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.