Trial reportWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2011
Comparison of antihyperglycemic effects of creatine and glibenclamide in type II diabetic patients.
Trial report in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Creatine Monohydrate Supplementation on Macro- and Microvascular Endothelial Function in Older Adults: A Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2024Trial
- Relationship between baseline and changed serum uric acid and the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a national cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Beneficial Impact of Semicarbazide-Sensitive Amine Oxidase Inhibition on the Potential Cytotoxicity of Creatine Supplementation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares the effects of glibenclamide and creatine in type II diabetics. In a 14-day symmetrically randomized crossover trial recently detected type II diabetics received either creatine (3 g) or glibenclamide (3.5 mg) for five successive days, followed by two days of washout, and crossover to the opposite treatment. Glucose, insulin, c-peptide, and creatine were measured. Creatine and glibenclamide decreased glucose concentrations vs. basal glucose [-15, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 min; mol/l]: 12.6±0.83 vs. 12.2±0.56 vs. 12.1±0.57, 15.3±0.63 vs. 13.5± 0.70(a ) vs. 13.0±0.57(a), 14.8±0.57 vs. 13.8±0.59(a) vs. 13.4±0.46(a), 14.6±0.61 vs. 12.3±0.49(b) vs. 12.4±0.61(a), 12.8±0.76 vs. 10.0± 0.40(c) vs. 10.3±0.41(c), and 11.4±0.67 vs. 8.3±0.40(c) vs. 8.5±0.36(c); ((a) p<0.05; (b) p<0.01; (c) p<0.001 vs. basal glucose). Treatment with both creatine and glibenclamide increased insulin and c-peptide concentrations after 120 and 240 min (p<0.05 and p<0.01). At the doses applied short-term treatment with creatine and glibenclamide elicits similar glucose lowering effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.