ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2011
Spinal anaesthesia and monitored conscious sedation for repair of infantile meningomyelocele.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMonitored conscious sedation combined with spinal anaesthesia (MCSS) to repair myelomeningocoele (MM) has received little attention in the literature. It has the potential of rapid postoperative recovery, minimal perioperative morbidity and probable reduced cost of management. The objective of this study was to prospectively analyze the safety and effectiveness of MCSS during repair of MM in infants. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis series consists of a prospective study of the clinical features, anaesthetic technique and perioperative outcome of 30 infants who underwent repair of MM under MCSS. The procedure was considered safe and effective if no event occurred during anaesthesia resulting in the procedure being aborted or postoperative complication related to the anaesthetic technique.
resultsThere were 19 males and 11 females. The median age of the patients was 3 months ranging from 2 days to 12 months. The study included patients with lumbar (four patients), lumbosacral (23 patients) and sacral (three patients) MM. None of the cases needed to be converted to general anaesthesia. The mean duration of surgery was 56.4 min (median = 55 min; range of 40-85 min). There was no significant perioperative morbidity or mortality.
conclusionsThe prevailing adverse socioeconomic status, health undermining religious belief, paucity of neurosurgeons/neuroanaesthetists and inadequate facilities in sub-Saharan Africa delay the presentation and surgical intervention of patients with MM. This technique is useful if the exclusion criteria are adhered to and should be considered as one of the armamentarium in economically challenged environments as it is probably cheaper than general anaesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.