Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21792344›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders2011

Mechanical intervention for maintenance of cartilage and bone.

Hui B Sun, Luis Cardoso, Hiroki Yokota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Biomechanical-Based Protocol forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hui B SunLeni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Luis Cardoso
Hiroki Yokota

Funding

MECHANICAL LOADING AND BONER01AR052144 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI YOKOTA, HIROKI · 2006 to 2018
$4.2M
Tendon Response to In Vivo Fatigue DamageR01AR052743 · NIAMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI ANDARAWIS-PURI, NELLY · 2005 to 2015
$3.4M
Age Related Bone Loss Assessed by Ultrasound Tomography: Bone Quality Beyond BMDSC2AG034198 · NIA · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI CARDOSO, LUIS · 2009 to 2011
$434k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052144NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052743NIA NIH HHS SC2 AG034198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical loading provides indispensible stimuli for growth and development of the articular cartilage and bone. Interestingly, depending on loading conditions loads applied to the joint can be beneficial as well as harmful to skeletal maintenance and remodeling. Moderate loads to the synovial joint, for instance, suppress the expression levels of matrix metallproteinases (MMPs), while loads above a threshold tend to increase their destructive activities. This report focuses on two recently developed loading modalities from animal studies, joint motion and joint loading. Their unique characteristics and potential usages for maintenance of the articular cartilage and stimulation of bone remodeling are reviewed. Also described are biophysical and molecular mechanisms which likely are responsible for the load-driven maintenance of cartilage and bone, and a possibility of developing load-mediated treatments of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

arthritisbone formationjoint motionknee loadingtissue degradation

Identifiers

PMID21792344
PMCPMC3140275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.