ArticleCancer management and research2011
Differences in treatment patterns among patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated by oncologists versus urologists in a US managed care population.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy.The New England journal of medicine · 2014Trial
- Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy.The New England journal of medicine · 2013Trial
- Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference-JAPAN 2025 at the 112Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Risk in Prostate Cancer Patients Using Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists or a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist.The Journal of urology · 2024Article
- Patient Demographics and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.Advances in urology · 2024Article
- The Role of Physician Specialty in the Underutilization of Standard-of-Care Treatment Intensification in Patients With Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer.The Journal of urology · 2023Article
- Treatment landscape and burden of disease in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: systematic and structured literature reviews.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Access to urologists for participation in research: An analysis of NCI's Community Oncology Research Program landscape survey.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- Comparison of Hospital Length of Stay and Supportive Care Utilization Between Patients Treated with CPX-351 and 7+3 for Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2022Article
- Increasing prevalence of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a managed care population in the United States.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021Article
- Intensity of treatment in Swiss cancer patients at the end-of-life.Cancer management and research · 2018Article
- A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2018Article
- Treatment patterns and trends in patients dying of prostate cancer in Quebec: a population-based study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2017Article
- Abiraterone acetate and prednisone in chemotherapy-naïve prostate cancer patients: rationale, evidence and clinical utility.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2017Review
- Abiraterone acetate after progression with enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multi-center retrospective analysis.BMC research notes · 2016Article
- International survey of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic prostate cancer in 19 countries.ESMO open · 2016Article
- Population-based impact on overall survival after the introduction of docetaxel as standard therapy for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDifferences in treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs between patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated by oncologists and those treated by urologists were examined.
methodsPatients aged ≥40 with CRPC were identified using claims from a large US managed health care plan between July 2001 and December 2007. A 6-month baseline period was used to assess patient characteristics. Patients with visits to an urologist, without visits to an oncologist, were assigned to the urology cohort, and patients with visits to an oncologist, with or without visits to an urologist, were assigned to the oncology cohort. Treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs during a variable follow-up period were compared between cohorts using descriptive statistics and Lin's regression.
resultsThe urology cohort had fewer comorbid illnesses (P < 0.001) and patients were less likely to have other cancers during baseline (P < 0.001) or to die during follow-up (P = 0.004) compared with the oncology cohort. The oncology cohort patients were significantly more likely to have a claim for hormones (74.5% vs 61.1%; P < 0.001), chemotherapy (46.9% vs 10.2%, P < 0.001), and radiation (22.3% vs 3.7%, P < 0.0001) over follow-up. Mean unadjusted health care costs were higher in the oncology vs the urology cohort (US$31,896 vs US$15,318, respectively; P < 0.001). At 6 years follow-up, cumulative adjusted CRPC-specific costs were significantly higher among patients treated by oncologists with chemotherapy than among patients treated by urologists.
conclusionCRPC patients treated by oncologists had greater use of hormones, chemotherapy, and radiation; higher percentages of patients with inpatient stays, emergency room, and ambulatory visits; and higher health care costs, than patients treated by urologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.