Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21792201›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2011

Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts.

P C Thuss-Patience, A Kretzschmar, Y Dogan, F Rothmann, I Blau, I Schwaner, K Breithaupt, D Bichev, M Grothoff, C Grieser and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Quality of life with biweekly docetaxel and capecitabine in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Response to preoperative chemotherapy predicts survival in patients undergoing hepatectomy for liver metastases from gastric and esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

P C Thuss-PatienceMedizinische Klinik m. S. Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany. peter.thuss@charite.de
A Kretzschmar
Y Dogan
F Rothmann
I Blau
I Schwaner
K Breithaupt
D Bichev
M Grothoff
C Grieser
P Reichardt
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEHelios Hospital Bad Saarow · DEKlinikum Ernst von Bergmann · DEKlinikum St. Georg · DEMVZ - Kurfürstendamm · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo comparisons of different doses of docetaxel-capecitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer have been performed.

methodsPatients with previously untreated metastatic/locally advanced gastro-oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Two sequential cohorts received docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 1) plus capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily (days 1-14) (cohort I) or docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) (day 1) plus capecitabine 800 mg m(-2) twice daily (days 1-14) (cohort II) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was confirmed overall response rate.

resultsIn all, 91 patients were enrolled (cohort I, n=40; cohort II, n=51) and 87 were evaluable for efficacy (n=38, 49, respectively). Overall response rate was 50.0% in cohort I and 23.5% in cohort II (exploratory analysis, P=0.014). Median times to tumour progression and overall survival were 5.6 and 10.1 months in cohort I and 3.7 and 7.2 months in cohort II, respectively. Dose reductions for docetaxel and capecitabine were required in 50.0% and 57.5% of patients in cohort I and 11.8% and 15.7% in cohort II, respectively.

conclusionStarting treatment with full doses and reducing promptly seems to be the more promisingly effective strategy than starting cautiously with lower doses. Docetaxel/capecitabine 75/2000 mg m(-2) is a manageable, convenient outpatient combination with promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCohort StudiesDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleCapecitabineDeoxycytidineDocetaxelFluorouracilTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID21792201
PMCPMC3170974
OpenAlexW2071662146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.