Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21792073›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2011

Development and validation of a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction classifier for lung cancer prognosis.

Guoan Chen, Sinae Kim, Jeremy M G Taylor, Zhuwen Wang, Oliver Lee, Nithya Ramnath, Rishindra M Reddy, Jules Lin, Andrew C Chang, Mark B Orringer and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guoan ChenDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5942, USA.
Sinae Kim
Jeremy M G Taylor
Zhuwen Wang
Oliver Lee
Nithya Ramnath
Rishindra M Reddy
Jules Lin
Andrew C Chang
Mark B Orringer
David G Beer
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
MICHIGAN INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH (MICHR) (UL1): (BPCA)UL1RR024986 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHANLEY, THOMAS P. · 2007 to 2011
$51.2M
Biostatistics Training Program in Cancer ResearchT32CA083654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Kelley McLain Kidwell · 2002 to 2026
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS T32 CA083654NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024986NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis prospective study aimed to develop a robust and clinically applicable method to identify patients with high-risk early-stage lung cancer and then to validate this method for use in future translational studies.

methodsThree published Affymetrix microarray data sets representing 680 primary tumors were used in the survival-related gene selection procedure using clustering, Cox model, and random survival forest analysis. A final set of 91 genes was selected and tested as a predictor of survival using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay using an independent cohort of 101 lung adenocarcinomas.

resultsThe random survival forest model built from 91 genes in the training set predicted patient survival in an independent cohort of 101 lung adenocarcinomas, with a prediction error rate of 26.6%. The mortality risk index was significantly related to survival (Cox model p < 0.00001) and separated all patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups (hazard ratio = 1.00, 2.82, 4.42). The mortality risk index was also related to survival in stage 1 patients (Cox model p = 0.001), separating patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups (hazard ratio = 1.00, 3.29, 3.77).

conclusionsThe development and validation of this robust quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction platform allows prediction of patient survival with early-stage lung cancer. Utilization will now allow investigators to evaluate it prospectively by incorporation into new clinical trials with the goal of personalized treatment of patients with lung cancer and improving patient survival.

Indexed as

Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAdenocarcinomaAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellDNA, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID21792073
PMCPMC3167380
OpenAlexW2022998517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.