Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21791674›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2011

Interactions between genetic variants and breast cancer risk factors in the breast and prostate cancer cohort consortium.

Daniele Campa, Rudolf Kaaks, Loïc Le Marchand, Christopher A Haiman, Ruth C Travis, Christine D Berg, Julie E Buring, Stephen J Chanock, W Ryan Diver, Lucie Dostal and 25 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 28 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 28 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 28 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update on the relationship between theThe Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Genetic Variation and Hot Flashes: A Systematic Review.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Aberrant promoter methylation of HIN-1 gene may contribute to the pathogenesis of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  14. Association of TGF-β1 -509C/T polymorphisms with breast cancer risk: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Single nucleotide polymorphism 6q25.1 rs2046210 and increased risk of breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Polymorphism of 8q24 rsl3281615 and breast cancer risk : a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 11 institutions in 11 countries.

Daniele CampaGenomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum; DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Rudolf Kaaks
Loïc Le Marchand
Christopher A Haiman
Ruth C Travis
Christine D Berg
Julie E Buring
Stephen J Chanock
W Ryan Diver
Lucie Dostal
Agnes Fournier
Susan E Hankinson
Brian E Henderson
Robert N Hoover
Claudine Isaacs
Mattias Johansson
Laurence N Kolonel
Peter Kraft
I-Min Lee
Catherine A McCarty
Kim Overvad
Salvatore Panico
Petra H M Peeters
Elio Riboli
Maria José Sanchez
Fredrick R Schumacher
Guri Skeie
Daniel O Stram
Michael J Thun
Dimitrios Trichopoulos
Shumin Zhang
Regina G Ziegler
David J Hunter
Sara Lindström
Federico Canzian
DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance · DEHeidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHarvard University Press · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Southern California · USAmerican Cancer Society · USAndalusian School of Public Health · ESHarvard University · USUmeå University · SEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Laboratory of Translational GenomicsZIACP010201 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PROKUNINA-OLSSON, LIUDMILA · 2010 to 2025
$91.2M
University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Xin Chen · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
Characterizing Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Prostate Cancer; the BPC3U01CA098758 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HENDERSON, BRIAN E · 2003 to 2010
$11.0M
Characterizing Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Prostate Cancer; the BPC3U01CA098233 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HUNTER, DAVID JOHN · 2003 to 2010
$10.8M
Epidemiologic StudiesU19CA148065 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL, BRUGGE, JOAN SIEFERT · 2010 to 2014
$10.6M
Characterizing Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Prostate Cancer; the BPC3U01CA098216 · NCI · INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RES ON CANCER · PI RIBOLI, ELIO · 2003 to 2011
$7.4M
Characterizing Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Prostate Cancer: The BPC3.U01CA098710 · NCI · AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, INC. · PI GAPSTUR, SUSAN M · 2003 to 2011
$4.2M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789NCI NIH HHS U01 CA098216NCI NIH HHS U01 CA098233NCI NIH HHS U01 CA098710NCI NIH HHS U01 CA098758NCI NIH HHS U01-CA98216-06NCI NIH HHS U01-CA98233-07NCI NIH HHS U01-CA98710-06NCI NIH HHS U01-CA98758-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, several genome-wide association studies have identified various genetic susceptibility loci for breast cancer. Relatively little is known about the possible interactions between these loci and the established risk factors for breast cancer.

methodsTo assess interactions between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and established risk factors, we prospectively collected DNA samples and questionnaire data from 8576 breast cancer case subjects and 11 892 control subjects nested within the National Cancer Institute's Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). We genotyped 17 germline SNPs (FGFR2-rs2981582, FGFR2-rs3750817, TNRC9-rs3803662, 2q35-rs13387042, MAP3K1-rs889312, 8q24-rs13281615, CASP8-rs1045485, LSP1-rs3817198, COL1A1-rs2075555, COX11-rs6504950, RNF146-rs2180341, 6q25-rs2046210, SLC4A7-rs4973768, NOTCH2-rs11249433, 5p12-rs4415084, 5p12-rs10941679, RAD51L1-rs999737), and odds ratios were estimated by logistic regression to confirm previously reported associations with breast cancer risk. We performed likelihood ratio test to assess interactions between 17 SNPs and nine established risk factors (age at menarche, parity, age at menopause, use of hormone replacement therapy, family history, height, body mass index, smoking status, and alcohol consumption), and a correction for multiple testing of 153 tests (adjusted P value threshold = .05/153 = 3 × 10(-4)) was done. Case-case comparisons were performed for possible differential associations of polymorphisms by subgroups of tumor stage, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and age at diagnosis. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsWe confirmed the association of 14 SNPs with breast cancer risk (P(trend) = 2.57 × 10(-3) -3.96 × 10(-19)). Three SNPs (LSP1-rs3817198, COL1A1-rs2075555, and RNF146-rs2180341) did not show association with breast cancer risk. After accounting for multiple testing, no statistically significant interactions were detected between the 17 SNPs and the nine risk factors. We also confirmed that SNPs in FGFR2 and TNRC9 were associated with greater risk of estrogen receptor-positive than estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer (P(heterogeneity) = .0016 for FGFR2-rs2981582 and P(heterogeneity) = .0053 for TNRC9-rs3803662). SNP 5p12-rs10941679 was statistically significantly associated with greater risk of progesterone receptor-positive than progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer (P(heterogeneity) = .0028).

conclusionThis study does not support the hypothesis that known common breast cancer susceptibility loci strongly modify the associations between established risk factors and breast cancer.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAlcohol DrinkingBody Mass IndexBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicEstrogen Replacement TherapyEuropeFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansLogistic ModelsMenopauseNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID21791674
PMCPMC3156803
OpenAlexW2132055476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.