Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21791470›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2011

Cancer testis antigens in newly diagnosed and relapse multiple myeloma: prognostic markers and potential targets for immunotherapy.

Mark van Duin, Annemiek Broyl, Yvonne de Knegt, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Paul G Richardson, Wim C J Hop, Bronno van der Holt, Debora Joseph-Pietras, George Mulligan, Rachel Neuwirth and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00048230 phase3completednot on this map

An International, Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study of PS-341 (VELCADE™) Versus High-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2002 to 2004Enrolled620ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsbortezomib
NCT00049478 no registry record found
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. IncreasedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development of Novel Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Mark van DuinDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.vanduin@erasmusmc.nl
Annemiek Broyl
Yvonne de Knegt
Hartmut Goldschmidt
Paul G Richardson
Wim C J Hop
Bronno van der Holt
Debora Joseph-Pietras
George Mulligan
Rachel Neuwirth
Surinder S Sahota
Pieter Sonneveld
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLMillennium Engineering and Integration (United States) · USUniversity of Southampton · GBDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn multiple myeloma, expression of cancer testis antigens may provide prognostic markers and potential targets for immunotherapy. Expression at relapse has not yet been evaluated for a large panel of cancer testis antigens which can be classified by varying expression in normal tissue: restricted to testis, expressed in testis and brain and not restricted but selectively expressed in testis. DESIGN AND

methodsEvaluation of cancer testis antigen expression was made in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma cases (HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial; n = 320) and in relapse cases (APEX, SUMMIT, CREST trials; n = 264). Presence of expression using Affymetrix GeneChips was determined for 123 cancer testis antigens. Of these 87 had a frequency of more than 5% in the newly diagnosed and relapsed patients, and were evaluated in detail.

resultsTissue restriction was known for 58 out of 87 cancer testis antigens. A significantly lower frequency of presence calls in the relapsed compared to newly diagnosed cases was found for 3 out of 13 testis restricted genes, 2 out of 7 testis/brain restricted genes, and 17 out of 38 testis selective genes. MAGEC1, MAGEB2 and SSX1 were the most frequent testis-restricted cancer testis antigens in both data sets. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that presence of MAGEA6 and CDCA1 were clearly associated with shorter progression free survival, and presence of MAGEA9 with shorter overall survival in the set of newly diagnosed cases. In the set of relapse cases, presence of CTAG2 was associated with shorter progression free survival and presence of SSX1 with shorter overall survival.

conclusionsRelapsed multiple myeloma reveals extensive cancer testis antigen expression. Cancer testis antigens are confirmed as useful prognostic markers in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients and in relapsed multiple myeloma patients. The HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial is registered under Dutch trial register n. NTR-213. CREST, SUMMIT and APEX trials were registered under ns. M34100-024, M34100-025 and NCT00049478/NCT00048230, respectively.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticTesticular NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalHumansImmunotherapyMaleMultiple MyelomaRecurrenceSurvival RateAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID21791470
PMCPMC3208684
OpenAlexW2132410859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.