Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21791070›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2011

Collaborative planning approach to inform the implementation of a healthcare manager intervention for Hispanics with serious mental illness: a study protocol.

Leopoldo J Cabassa, Benjamin Druss, Yuanjia Wang, Roberto Lewis-Fernández

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leopoldo J CabassaNew York State Center of Excellence for Cultural Competence, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA. cabassa@nyspi.columbia.edu
Benjamin Druss
Yuanjia Wang
Roberto Lewis-Fernández
New York State Department of State · USColumbia University · USEmory University · US

Funding

IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Improving the Effectiveness of Treatment for Depression in HispanicsR01MH076051 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BLANCO, CARLOS · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
Mentoring and Research: Public Health Interventions to Improve Health in SMIK24MH075867 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRUSS, BENJAMIN G · 2006 to 2015
$1.3M
Implementing Health Care Interventions for Hispanics with Serious Mental IllnessK01MH091118 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI CABASSA, LEOPOLDO J · 2011 to 2015
$927k
NIA NIH HHS AG03113-01A2NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH091118NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH075867NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076051NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study describes a collaborative planning approach that blends principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and intervention mapping to modify a healthcare manager intervention to a new patient population and provider group and to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this modified intervention to improve the physical health of Hispanics with serious mental illness (SMI) and at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

methodsThe proposed study uses a multiphase approach that applies CBPR principles and intervention-mapping steps--an intervention-planning approach--to move from intervention planning to pilot testing. In phase I, a community advisory board composed of researchers and stakeholders will be assembled to learn and review the intervention and make initial modifications. Phase II uses a combination of qualitative methods--patient focus groups and stakeholder interviews--to ensure that the modifications are acceptable to all stakeholders. Phase III uses results from phase II to further modify the intervention, develop an implementation plan, and train two care managers on the modified intervention. Phase IV consists of a 12-month open pilot study (N = 30) to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the modified intervention and explore its initial effects. Lastly, phase V consists of analysis of pilot study data and preparation for future funding to develop a more rigorous evaluation of the modified intervention. DISCUSSION: The proposed study is one of the few projects to date to focus on improving the physical health of Hispanics with SMI and at risk for CVD by using a collaborative planning approach to enhance the transportability and use of a promising healthcare manager intervention. This study illustrates how blending health-disparities research and implementation science can help reduce the disproportionate burden of medical illness in a vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorMental DisordersCardiovascular DiseasesCase ManagementClinical ProtocolsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEducational StatusFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PlanningHealth ServicesHealth Status DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansNew YorkPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID21791070
PMCPMC3169485
OpenAlexW2113390423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.