Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21790944›Full record

ReviewCellular microbiology2011

Bacterial subversion of host actin dynamics at the plasma membrane.

Rey Carabeo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparative Genome Analysis of 33Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Pathogenic Puppetry: Manipulation of the Host Actin Cytoskeleton byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epithelial Keratins Modulate cMet Expression and Signaling and Promote InlB-MediatedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rey CarabeoCentre for Molecular Microbiology and Infection, Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK. r.carabeo@imperial.ac.uk

Funding

CHLAMYDIAL INVASION OF NON-PHAGOCYTIC CELLSR01AI065545 · NIAID · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARABEO, REY A · 2005 to 2021
$3.3M
Medical Research Council G0900213NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI065545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasion of non-phagocytic cells by a number of bacterial pathogens involves the subversion of the actin cytoskeletal remodelling machinery to produce actin-rich cell surface projections designed to engulf the bacteria. The signalling that occurs to induce these actin-rich structures has considerable overlap among a diverse group of bacteria. The molecular organization within these structures act in concert to internalize the invading pathogen. This dynamic process could be subdivided into three acts - actin recruitment, engulfment, and finally, actin disassembly/internalization. This review will present the current state of knowledge of the molecular processes involved in each stage of bacterial invasion, and provide a perspective that highlights the temporal and spatial control of actin remodelling that occurs during bacterial invasion.

Indexed as

EndocytosisHost-Pathogen InteractionsActinsBacteriaCell MembraneSignal TransductionActins

Identifiers

PMID21790944
PMCPMC3174476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.