Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21790474›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2012

Short communication routine HIV testing in the emergency department: assessment of patient perceptions.

D Scott Batey, Victoria L Hogan, Ryan Cantor, Christopher M Hamlin, Kelly Ross-Davis, Christa Nevin, Cindy Zimmerman, Shakira Thomas, Michael J Mugavero, James H Willig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A review of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) rapid testing.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D Scott BateyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA. dsbatey@uab.edu
Victoria L Hogan
Ryan Cantor
Christopher M Hamlin
Kelly Ross-Davis
Christa Nevin
Cindy Zimmerman
Shakira Thomas
Michael J Mugavero
James H Willig
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI OLAF KUTSCH · 1988 to 2026
$84.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI27767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CDC released revised HIV testing guidelines in 2006 recommending routine, opt-out HIV testing in acute care settings including emergency departments (ED). Patient attitudes have been cited as a barrier to implementation of routine HIV testing in the ED. We assessed patients' perceptions of HIV testing in the ED through a contextual qualitative approach. The study was conducted during a 72-h period. All adults presenting to the ED without life-threatening trauma or psychiatric crisis completed a standardized questionnaire. The questionnaire explored HIV testing history, knowledge of testing resources, and qualitative items addressing participant perceptions about advantages and disadvantages to ED testing. After completion of the interview, participants were offered a free, confidential, rapid HIV test. Among 329 eligible individuals approached, 288 (87.5%) completed the initial interview. Participants overwhelmingly (n=247, 85.8%) reported support for testing and identified increased knowledge (41%), prevention (12.5%), convenience (11.8%), and treatment (4.9%) among the advantages. Fear and denial about one's HIV status, reported by <5% of patients, were identified as the most significant barriers to ED testing. Bivariate analysis determined race and ethnicity differences between individuals completing the interview and those who refused (p<0.05). Among individuals consenting for testing (n=186, 64.6%), no positives were detected. Most patients support HIV testing in the ED, noting knowledge of status, prevention, convenience, and linkage to early treatment as distinct advantages. These data are of particular benefit to decision makers considering the addition of routine HIV testing in EDs.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency Service, HospitalMass ScreeningAdolescentAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisAnxietyFemaleHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicSocial PerceptionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21790474
PMCPMC3316117
OpenAlexW2076395066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.