Trial reportUpdates in surgery2011
Harmonic Focus™ versus "knot tying" during total thyroidectomy: a randomized trial.
Trial report in Updates in surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sutureless FOCUS harmonic scalpel versus clamp-and-tie techniques for thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis of 43 randomized controlled trials.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- ENERgized vessel sealing systems versus CONventional hemostasis techniques in thyroid surgery--the ENERCON systematic review and network meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2013Pooled it
- A comparison of surgical outcomes and complications between hemostatic devices for thyroid surgery: a network meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017Review
- Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic Focus in thyroidectomy compared to conventional techniques.Thyroid research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study is to compare the outcome of total thyroidectomy (TT) using the Harmonic Focus™ (HF) versus conventional "knot tying" (KT) in terms of operative time, parathyroid function and post-operative complications. This prospective study was designed with a random allocation of subjects using a drawing technique. Eighty-one consecutive patients were submitted to TT in 2010 and randomly divided into two groups: 43 patients operated using HF (HF group) and 38 patients operated using KT (KT group). Parathyroid function was evaluated by parathyroid hormone (PTH) level at 1 h postoperatively and calcium level at first post-operative day. Indications for medical therapy were PTH < 15 pg/ml and/or calcium < 8.0 mg/dl and/or clinical signs or symptoms of hypocalcemia. Main outcomes were operative time, PTH and calcium levels, need for medical therapy and post-operative complications. Mean operative time was significantly lower in HF group compared with KT group (100 ± 34 vs. 119 ± 30 min). There were no significant differences concerning transient hypoparathyroidism requiring calcium and/or vitamin D therapy: 17 patients (39.5%) in HF group versus 21 (55.3%) in KT group. Five patients (11.6%) in HF group experienced symptomatic hypocalcemia versus 6 (15.8%) in KT group, without statistically significant difference. No patients experienced recurrent nerve injury. HF is a new ergonomic, reliable device developed for thyroid surgery. According to our results, HF is a safe, time-saving alternative to "knot tying" thyroidectomy, with no influence on parathyroid function, medical therapy and nerve injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.