ArticleParkinson's disease2011
Impact of external cue validity on driving performance in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Parkinson's disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Parkinson's Disease and Driving Fitness: A Systematic Review of the Existing Guidelines.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Pooled it
- Personalizing driver safety interfaces via driver cognitive factors inference.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Driving with a neurodegenerative disorder: an overview of the current literature.Journal of neurology · 2017Review
- Internally Versus Externally Cued Speech in Parkinson's Disease and Cerebellar Disease.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2017Article
- Physicians' role in the determination of fitness to drive in patients with Parkinson's disease: systematic review of the assessment tools and a call for national guidelines.Journal of clinical movement disorders · 2016Review
- Systematic review of the evidence for Trails B cut-off scores in assessing fitness-to-drive.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2013Article
- Parkinson disease and driving: an evidence-based review.Neurology · 2012Review
- Driving errors in Parkinson's disease: moving closer to predicting on-road outcomes.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to investigate the impact of external cue validity on simulated driving performance in 19 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and 19 healthy age-matched controls. Braking points and distance between deceleration point and braking point were analysed for red traffic signals preceded either by Valid Cues (correctly predicting signal), Invalid Cues (incorrectly predicting signal), and No Cues. Results showed that PD drivers braked significantly later and travelled significantly further between deceleration and braking points compared with controls for Invalid and No-Cue conditions. No significant group differences were observed for driving performance in response to Valid Cues. The benefit of Valid Cues relative to Invalid Cues and No Cues was significantly greater for PD drivers compared with controls. Trail Making Test (B-A) scores correlated with driving performance for PDs only. These results highlight the importance of external cues and higher cognitive functioning for driving performance in mild to moderate PD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.