Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21788609›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2011

R1 in the Shaker S4 occupies the gating charge transfer center in the resting state.

Meng-chin A Lin, Jui-Yi Hsieh, Allan F Mock, Diane M Papazian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanism of voltage sensing in CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of KHandbook of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Calcium channel gating.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Review
  12. Gating-induced large aqueous volumetric remodeling and aspartate tolerance in the voltage sensor domain of Shaker KProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Voltage and pH sensing by the voltage-gated proton channel, HJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meng-chin A LinDepartment of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Jui-Yi Hsieh
Allan F Mock
Diane M Papazian

Funding

Voltage-Dependent Activation in K+ ChannelsR01GM043459 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PAPAZIAN, DIANE M · 1990 to 2014
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043459NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM43459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During voltage-dependent activation in Shaker channels, four arginine residues in the S4 segment (R1-R4) cross the transmembrane electric field. It has been proposed that R1-R4 movement is facilitated by a "gating charge transfer center" comprising a phenylalanine (F290) in S2 plus two acidic residues, one each in S2 and S3. According to this proposal, R1 occupies the charge transfer center in the resting state, defined as the conformation in which S4 is maximally retracted toward the cytoplasm. However, other evidence suggests that R1 is located extracellular to the charge transfer center, near I287 in S2, in the resting state. To investigate the resting position of R1, we mutated I287 to histidine (I287H), paired it with histidine mutations of key voltage sensor residues, and determined the effect of extracellular Zn(2+) on channel activity. In I287H+R1H, Zn(2+) generated a slow component of activation with a maximum amplitude (A(slow,max)) of ∼56%, indicating that only a fraction of voltage sensors can bind Zn(2+) at a holding potential of -80 mV. A(slow,max) decreased after applying either depolarizing or hyperpolarizing prepulses from -80 mV. The decline of A(slow,max) after negative prepulses indicates that R1 moves inward to abolish ion binding, going beyond the point where reorientation of the I287H and R1H side chains would reestablish a binding site. These data support the proposal that R1 occupies the charge transfer center upon hyperpolarization. Consistent with this, pairing I287H with A359H in the S3-S4 loop generated a Zn(2+)-binding site. At saturating concentrations, A(slow,max) reached 100%, indicating that Zn(2+) traps the I287H+A359H voltage sensor in an absorbing conformation. Transferring I287H+A359H into a mutant background that stabilizes the resting state significantly enhanced Zn(2+) binding at -80 mV. Our results strongly support the conclusion that R1 occupies the gating charge transfer center in the resting conformation.

Indexed as

AnimalsHistidineIon Channel GatingMembrane PotentialsMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularMutationOocytesProtein Structure, TertiaryShaker Superfamily of Potassium ChannelsXenopusZincHistidineMembrane ProteinsShaker Superfamily of Potassium ChannelsZinc

Identifiers

PMID21788609
PMCPMC3149438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.