Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21788520›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

A diversity of paracrine signals sustains molecular circadian cycling in suprachiasmatic nucleus circuits.

Elizabeth S Maywood, Johanna E Chesham, John A O'Brien, Michael H Hastings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 184 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
184citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

184 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reconsidering mammalian circadian organization.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The inferred functional connectome underlying circadian synchronization in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development of compounds for targeted degradation of mammalian cryptochrome proteins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Neuropeptidergic Input from the Lateral Hypothalamus to the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Alters the Circadian Period in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth S MaywoodDivision of Neurobiology, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom. emaywood@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
Johanna E Chesham
John A O'Brien
Michael H Hastings

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council EO225531Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council EO232231Medical Research Council MC_U105170643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the principal circadian pacemaker of mammals, coordinating daily rhythms of behavior and metabolism. Circadian timekeeping in SCN neurons revolves around transcriptional/posttranslational feedback loops, in which Period (Per) and Cryptochrome (Cry) genes are negatively regulated by their protein products. Recent studies have revealed, however, that these "core loops" also rely upon cytosolic and circuit-level properties for sustained oscillation. To characterize interneuronal signals responsible for robust pacemaking in SCN cells and circuits, we have developed a unique coculture technique using wild-type (WT) "graft" SCN to drive pacemaking (reported by PER2::LUCIFERASE bioluminescence) in "host" SCN deficient either in elements of neuropeptidergic signaling or in elements of the core feedback loop. We demonstrate that paracrine signaling is sufficient to restore cellular synchrony and amplitude of pacemaking in SCN circuits lacking vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). By using grafts with mutant circadian periods we show that pacemaking in the host SCN is specified by the genotype of the graft, confirming graft-derived factors as determinants of the host rhythm. By combining pharmacological with genetic manipulations, we show that a hierarchy of neuropeptidergic signals underpins this paracrine regulation, with a preeminent role for VIP augmented by contributions from arginine vasopressin (AVP) and gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP). Finally, we show that interneuronal signaling is sufficiently powerful to maintain circadian pacemaking in arrhythmic Cry-null SCN, deficient in essential elements of the transcriptional negative feedback loops. Thus, a hierarchy of paracrine neuropeptidergic signals determines cell- and circuit-level circadian pacemaking in the SCN.

Indexed as

Paracrine CommunicationSignal TransductionAnimalsCircadian RhythmCoculture TechniquesCryptochromesGene Expression RegulationMiceNerve NetReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IISuprachiasmatic NucleusVasoactive Intestinal PeptideCry1 protein, mouseCry2 protein, mouseCryptochromesReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIVasoactive Intestinal Peptide

Identifiers

PMID21788520
PMCPMC3161534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.