Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21788494›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Comparative genomics of xylose-fermenting fungi for enhanced biofuel production.

Dana J Wohlbach, Alan Kuo, Trey K Sato, Katlyn M Potts, Asaf A Salamov, Kurt M Labutti, Hui Sun, Alicia Clum, Jasmyn L Pangilinan, Erika A Lindquist and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Production of Lactate by Metabolically EngineeredJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Machine learning enables identification of an alternative yeast galactose utilization pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Advances inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome Sequence and Analysis of the Flavinogenic YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dana J WohlbachDepartment of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Alan Kuo
Trey K Sato
Katlyn M Potts
Asaf A Salamov
Kurt M Labutti
Hui Sun
Alicia Clum
Jasmyn L Pangilinan
Erika A Lindquist
Susan Lucas
Alla Lapidus
Mingjie Jin
Christa Gunawan
Venkatesh Balan
Bruce E Dale
Thomas W Jeffries
Robert Zinkel
Kerrie W Barry
Igor V Grigoriev
Audrey P Gasch
Joint Genome Institute · USGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
NLM NIH HHS 5T15LM007359NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulosic biomass is an abundant and underused substrate for biofuel production. The inability of many microbes to metabolize the pentose sugars abundant within hemicellulose creates specific challenges for microbial biofuel production from cellulosic material. Although engineered strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae can use the pentose xylose, the fermentative capacity pales in comparison with glucose, limiting the economic feasibility of industrial fermentations. To better understand xylose utilization for subsequent microbial engineering, we sequenced the genomes of two xylose-fermenting, beetle-associated fungi, Spathaspora passalidarum and Candida tenuis. To identify genes involved in xylose metabolism, we applied a comparative genomic approach across 14 Ascomycete genomes, mapping phenotypes and genotypes onto the fungal phylogeny, and measured genomic expression across five Hemiascomycete species with different xylose-consumption phenotypes. This approach implicated many genes and processes involved in xylose assimilation. Several of these genes significantly improved xylose utilization when engineered into S. cerevisiae, demonstrating the power of comparative methods in rapidly identifying genes for biomass conversion while reflecting on fungal ecology.

Indexed as

BiofuelsCandidaConserved SequenceFermentationFungiGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalGenomicsGenotypePhenotypePhylogenySpecies SpecificityXyloseBiofuelsXylose

Identifiers

PMID21788494
PMCPMC3156214
OpenAlexW2130769450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.