Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21788218›Full record

ReviewPediatrics2011

Automated dose-rounding recommendations for pediatric medications.

Kevin B Johnson, Carlton K K Lee, S Andrew Spooner, Coda L Davison, Jill S Helmke, Stuart T Weinberg

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Preventing Medication Errors in Paediatrics: A Narrative Review.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Pediatric Dose Rounding Protocol.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Standard dose development for medications commonly used in the neonatal intensive care unit.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence of Unrounded Medication Doses and Associated Factors Among Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Dose-Banding of Intravenous Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Pediatric Surgical Inpatients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin B JohnsonVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. kevin.johnson@vanderbilt.edu
Carlton K K Lee
S Andrew Spooner
Coda L Davison
Jill S Helmke
Stuart T Weinberg

Funding

Vanderbilt Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092986 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROTHMAN, RUSSELL L. · 2011 to 2020
$6.7M
STEPStools: Developing Web Services for Safe Pediatric DosingR18HS017216 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, KEVIN B. · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS017216AHRQ HHS R18HS17216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough pediatric electronic prescribing systems are increasingly being used in pediatric care, many of these systems lack the clinical decision-support infrastructure needed to calculate a safe and effective rounded medication dose. This infrastructure is required to facilitate tailoring of established dosing guidance while maintaining the medication's therapeutic intent.

objectiveThe goal of this project was to establish best practices for generating an appropriate medication dose and to create an interoperable rounding knowledge base combining best practices and dose-rounding information.

methodsWe interviewed 19 pediatric health care and pediatric pharmacy experts and conducted a literature review. After using these data to construct initial rounding tolerances, we used a Delphi process to achieve consensus about the rounding tolerance for each commonly prescribed medication.

resultsThree categories for medication-rounding philosophy emerged from our literature review: (1) medications for which rounding is used judiciously to retain the intended effect; (2) medications that are rounded with attention to potential unintended effects; and (3) medications that are rarely rounded because of the potential for toxicity. We assigned a small subset of medications to a fourth category-inadequate data-for which there was insufficient information to provide rounding recommendations. For all 102 medications, we were able to arrive at a consensus recommendation for rounding a given calculated dose.

conclusionsResults of this study provide the pediatric information technology community with a primary set of recommended rounding tolerances for commonly prescribed drugs. The interoperable knowledge base developed here can be integrated with existing and developing electronic prescribing systems, potentially improving prescribing safety and reducing cognitive workload.

Indexed as

ChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedElectronic PrescribingHealth Care SurveysHumansMedical Order Entry SystemsMedication ErrorsPediatricsPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID21788218
PMCPMC3387858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.