Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21788198›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2011

Environmental impact on vascular development predicted by high-throughput screening.

Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Richard S Judson, David M Reif, Nisha S Sipes, Amar V Singh, Kelly J Chandler, Rob Dewoskin, David J Dix, Robert J Kavlock, Thomas B Knudsen

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Systems Modeling of Developmental Vascular Toxicity.Current opinion in toxicology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole C KleinstreuerNational Center for Computational Toxiciology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. kleinstreuer.nicole@epa.gov
Richard S Judson
David M Reif
Nisha S Sipes
Amar V Singh
Kelly J Chandler
Rob Dewoskin
David J Dix
Robert J Kavlock
Thomas B Knudsen
Environmental Protection Agency · USLockheed Martin (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding health risks to embryonic development from exposure to environmental chemicals is a significant challenge given the diverse chemical landscape and paucity of data for most of these compounds. High-throughput screening (HTS) in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ToxCast™ project provides vast data on an expanding chemical library currently consisting of > 1,000 unique compounds across > 500 in vitro assays in phase I (complete) and Phase II (under way). This public data set can be used to evaluate concentration-dependent effects on many diverse biological targets and build predictive models of prototypical toxicity pathways that can aid decision making for assessments of human developmental health and disease.

objectiveWe mined the ToxCast phase I data set to identify signatures for potential chemical disruption of blood vessel formation and remodeling.

methodsToxCast phase I screened 309 chemicals using 467 HTS assays across nine assay technology platforms. The assays measured direct interactions between chemicals and molecular targets (receptors, enzymes), as well as downstream effects on reporter gene activity or cellular consequences. We ranked the chemicals according to individual vascular bioactivity score and visualized the ranking using ToxPi (Toxicological Priority Index) profiles.

resultsTargets in inflammatory chemokine signaling, the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, and the plasminogen-activating system were strongly perturbed by some chemicals, and we found positive correlations with developmental effects from the U.S. EPA ToxRefDB (Toxicological Reference Database) in vivo database containing prenatal rat and rabbit guideline studies. We observed distinctly different correlative patterns for chemicals with effects in rabbits versus rats, despite derivation of in vitro signatures based on human cells and cell-free biochemical targets, implying conservation but potentially differential contributions of developmental pathways among species. Follow-up analysis with antiangiogenic thalidomide analogs and additional in vitro vascular targets showed in vitro activity consistent with the most active environmental chemicals tested here.

conclusionsWe predicted that blood vessel development is a target for environmental chemicals acting as putative vascular disruptor compounds (pVDCs) and identified potential species differences in sensitive vascular developmental pathways.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysAnimalsCardiovascular SystemComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHumansMaleMaternal ExposureMiceModels, AnimalMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyRabbitsRatsEnvironmental PollutantsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID21788198
PMCPMC3226499
OpenAlexW2083989357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.