ArticleBMC genomics2011
Identification of genomic indels and structural variations using split reads.
Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-genome analysis reveals the growth-promoting and biocontrol potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba. YN.J3 isolated from Avena Sativa.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genome-wide characterization of copy number variants and their functional relevance in indigenous draught cattle of South Asia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Chromosomal deletions in banana somaclonal variants reveal negative regulators of immunity underlyingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Comparative study of tools for copy number variation detection using next-generation sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Loss of heterozygosity in CCM2 cDNA revealing a structural variant causing multiple cerebral cavernous malformations.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Optimizing Insertion and Deletion Detection Using Next-Generation Sequencing in the Clinical Laboratory.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2022Article
- Application and Challenge of 3rd Generation Sequencing for Clinical Bacterial Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Identification of Copy Number Alterations from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Single-cell sequencing of the small and AT-skewed genome of malaria parasites.Genome medicine · 2021Article
- CNV-MEANN: A Neural Network and Mind Evolutionary Algorithm-Based Detection of Copy Number Variations From Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Phenotype Driven Analysis of Whole Genome Sequencing Identifies Deep Intronic Variants that Cause Retinal Dystrophies by Aberrant Exonization.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- CONY: A Bayesian procedure for detecting copy number variations from sequencing read depths.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Polymorphic edge detection (PED): two efficient methods of polymorphism detection from next-generation sequencing data.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Somatic Mutagenesis in Mammals and Its Implications for Human Disease and Aging.Annual review of genetics · 2018Review
- MSeq-CNV: accurate detection of Copy Number Variation from Sequencing of Multiple samples.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- PSE-HMM: genome-wide CNV detection from NGS data using an HMM with Position-Specific Emission probabilities.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Technological considerations for genome-guided diagnosis and management of cancer.Genome medicine · 2016Review
- Quantitative detection of low-abundance somatic structural variants in normal cells by high-throughput sequencing.Nature methods · 2016Article
- Structural Variant Detection by Large-scale Sequencing Reveals New Evolutionary Evidence on Breed Divergence between Chinese and European Pigs.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies have demonstrated the genetic significance of insertions, deletions, and other more complex structural variants (SVs) in the human population. With the development of the next-generation sequencing technologies, high-throughput surveys of SVs on the whole-genome level have become possible. Here we present split-read identification, calibrated (SRiC), a sequence-based method for SV detection.
resultsWe start by mapping each read to the reference genome in standard fashion using gapped alignment. Then to identify SVs, we score each of the many initial mappings with an assessment strategy designed to take into account both sequencing and alignment errors (e.g. scoring more highly events gapped in the center of a read). All current SV calling methods have multilevel biases in their identifications due to both experimental and computational limitations (e.g. calling more deletions than insertions). A key aspect of our approach is that we calibrate all our calls against synthetic data sets generated from simulations of high-throughput sequencing (with realistic error models). This allows us to calculate sensitivity and the positive predictive value under different parameter-value scenarios and for different classes of events (e.g. long deletions vs. short insertions). We run our calculations on representative data from the 1000 Genomes Project. Coupling the observed numbers of events on chromosome 1 with the calibrations gleaned from the simulations (for different length events) allows us to construct a relatively unbiased estimate for the total number of SVs in the human genome across a wide range of length scales. We estimate in particular that an individual genome contains ~670,000 indels/SVs.
conclusionsCompared with the existing read-depth and read-pair approaches for SV identification, our method can pinpoint the exact breakpoints of SV events, reveal the actual sequence content of insertions, and cover the whole size spectrum for deletions. Moreover, with the advent of the third-generation sequencing technologies that produce longer reads, we expect our method to be even more useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.